<<< o >>>in winter's depths 52 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

I managed to spend some time up at Fleetwood today, and while the light was pretty atrocious for most of the time we were there, it did brighten up just as we were about to leave. As with yesterday's shot, I had a great deal of trouble producing a colour version of this shot I liked – it's almost as though winter sucks the colour out of everything, leaving nothing but drab greys and browns in its wake – but I'm reasonably happy with how this one turned out. If you're interested though, I did produce a monochrome version too:

.../archives/in_winters_depths.php

In many ways I think I prefer the second version, but a lot of my recent entries have been in black and white (or shades thereof) so I thought it was about time for a change. Let me know which one you prefer.

On another matter: it looks as though the new version of the site has settled down – it's a few hours since anyone emailed me with a problem – so it looks as thought the move went reasonably smoothly. As you can see, things are pretty much as they were on the previous version, but I've reworked a few sections. My about page is a bit more comprehensive, I've added a frequently asked questions page (that I haven't had time to write yet), and I've overhauled the buying prints page (and have also included some custom purchase pages for each image). Other than that though, it's pretty much business as usual ... fingers crossed :-)

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
2.40pm on 2/1/06
Canon 20D
EF 17-40 f/4L USM
17mm (27mm equiv.)
f/5.6
1/500
aperture priority
-1/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
2x1
 
2x1 + fylde coast [scenic] + people
comment by kim at 10:54 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2006

Oh my, it's gorgeous! I prefer the colour version, the way the light fades left to right. And the light on some of the pebbles in the foreground is lovely too. Love it.

comment by malko at 10:56 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2006

First ! lol

This one's crasy ! people on the left, the light, the colour...

comment by ps at 11:13 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2006

just chromasia... and no other words can describe it.

comment by YETi at 11:14 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2006

I dunno I love the winter colours. Both images are great and your are an inspiration.

hehe great when someone takes so long to post that they actually miss out on being first :)

comment by ps at 11:22 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2006

btw. there's a problem with archive page. under firefox is ok, but under IE the right-hand sidebar is at the bottom of the page :|

comment by LunaSol at 11:35 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2006

I love how this has a zig-zag effect. Moving in diagonals all the way from top to bottom. Just gorgeous. I like the color best, too

comment by Roumi at 11:39 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2006

Love the winter colours ! and the discreet presence of the two guys on the left. Nice shot ! and great photo blog !

comment by Rob at 11:39 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2006

Off to a terrific start. I love the color in this one. Nicely done.

comment by Josh at 11:56 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2006

Wow, wow, wow... I LOVE the color version. It has a magic that the monochrome doesn't.

comment by Rachel at 12:31 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Both the monochrome and color are superb. I do prefer the color, though. You have been amazing lately, Mr Nighingale. I only wish I could be as talented as you are.

comment by david at 12:31 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Fantastic landscape shot, great colours!

comment by Markus at 12:55 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

I prefer the coloured version. The red colours makes the shot a bit more dramatic than the monochrome version. Congratulations for your smooth changing of severs...

comment by Noushin at 12:58 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

I like the color version, the sky looks much more wild in this one.

comment by Sharla at 01:02 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

The color version is much better, that's from a b&w lover. It is almost a duotone with more depth, more subtlety, more emotion, warmer than the b&w. The composition and crop are excellent. The two silhouettes give the shot life and scale. And did I mention the very nice crop ...?

[Technical note: the shot came up much slower than usual, with the scan very noticeable. Could be a dozen reasons and none related to the new server but I mention it just to enter into the log.]

comment by Justin at 01:15 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Very nice image. Refreshingly different from your other beach images. I really like the color version, I think it has a lot more punch than its monochrome counterpart. The people add a great focal point too.

comment by jcyrhs at 01:50 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

it's been a long time since i wrote anything on your ever popular blog...

The post processing in this one is still a touch too much for my taste (especially the vignetting at the bottom right). Some thing that continues to amaze me is how you always manage to frame some human touch into the otherwise boring natural landscapre. The sloping shore/breakwater unbalances the horizontal rule of landscapre although it helps to lead attention to the couple. The warm tones chosen for the photo makes the far background loses details through mist since these colours have shorter wavelength. Nice cropping.

comment by Jason Milliron at 01:52 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Excellent! I perfer the B&W though.

comment by Paul at 02:28 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

I must move back to the beach! :(

comment by nuno f at 02:31 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

This color version is much better in my humble opinion. It's more warm and the human figures gain another emotional perspective.

comment by Pooh at 04:07 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Beautiful shot. The foreground, shoreline, people in the distance, and little cloud lines all create a very pleasing path for the eye to follow.

comment by Jay at 04:46 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Sorry. I'm embarrassed. But what does 2x1 cropping mean? Is that just a ratio? I don't think I've seen you use that before. Jay

comment by east3rd at 05:32 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Holy cow, this is just goregous. One of my faves of yours, David.

comment by Navin Harish at 05:33 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Everything seems to be perfect with this shot. From the yellowish sky to the mist and from t he round wet stones to the two people walking. Had you taken this shot a few days ago, you could have used it for a New Year card.

comment by Parker at 05:46 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Absolutely gorgeous picture. I don't know what else to say. Just... wow. You sure have some photogenic beaches over there across the pond.

Thanks for fixing those RSS feeds too. You're great!

comment by Adriana at 08:10 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

I saw the black and white version and I really liked it, but for some reason I prefer the color one. I think is because it allows me to appreciate the depthness of the sky and the mood of the entire environment clearer than the other one. If this is what you manage to get with winter when it sucks, what can you do with a day that doesn't suck? Well I think we all have seen the thinks you do. Have a nice day.

comment by Alan Pards at 09:13 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Love this picture, its got so many bits and bobs to it.

Brilliant.

comment by Kim at 11:06 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Good composition but why not improve depth of field with a higher f-stop?

comment by Arthur at 11:20 AM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

I like the B&W version, but the colour one really leaps out at you! Great shot— like the 2:1 crop.

I notice you tend to shoot with a negative exposure bias—do you find the metering tends to blow out the highlights (my 350 seems to...), or is there another reason?

Great stuff.

comment by Chris at 12:27 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Jay -- you're right -- it's the ratio he used for the crop. If you check the image properties, it's 900 pixels wide by 450 pixels high, or a 2:1 ratio.

comment by Christopher Shipman at 01:57 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

I really like this. I'd have to say I definitely prefer the black and white version. I think that the less-than-exciting colors detract from the beautiful light in this image. Strip away those distracting colors and that light is really powerful.
Also, I find it really interesting that you shoot at f/5.6 for many of your shots, even the ones that have deep depth of field. Seeing you produce such great images with such deep DOF at f/5.6 is making me rethink how I use my own Canon 17-40mm. Do you find that f/5.6 is the "sweet spot" in terms of sharpness? Just wondering what the downside of a smaller aperture would be. It looks like you had shutter speed to burn (1/500sec)!

comment by Judith Polakoff at 02:31 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

I think I actually prefer the way the light reflects off the rocks in the B&W version, but you did a fantastic job with the color for having had such difficulties, which I prefer over the B&W on the whole, as I'm experiencing the same sucking out of color in my neck of the woods and crave any hint of color at this point.

comment by Neil at 04:27 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

The foreground lighting is really really nice.

comment by ody at 04:38 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

i'm wordless..
you take my breath away..

comment by Bartek at 04:52 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Very nice. A bit moody. I like the pastels. The people on the far left give the photo a great context.

comment by Michael Brown at 05:25 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

It all has been said already, so I'll simply say, ... "stunning"!

comment by Renato at 05:29 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Very nice!!!

I myself think that the winter offers great opportunities to shoot by the sea. Combine clouds, a rough sea and the winter colours and you have a recipe for potential great photos...

comment by Paul Woolrich at 07:51 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

This is a wonderful shot I really like the reflection of the light in the wet stone in the foreground.

comment by Chris Clark at 08:00 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

The aspect ratio does wonders for this image, as do the colors and everything else :)

comment by kevin at 09:21 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

sorry mate, I really like the first one. The second one has nothing wrong with it, I just show favoritism towards the nice brown hues. Nothing like rich Earth tones. Sure it's drab, but that just establishes a mood that fits the photo. No point in changing the atmosphere-- especially when it's so captivating (I also really like the two personages on the rocks. It certainly recreates the image, and takes the dominant focus of viewers, when you'd expect the towering clouds, or even the crisp rocks in the foreground to take the lead.

comment by Anil at 10:22 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

First have to say I like your new about page. Compared to the old one it is more comprehensive and satisfied my curiosity completely :)

Coming to the image, I prfer the b/w version too. Somehow the beauty of the rocks and water comes out best in that version.

comment by Jamie at 11:38 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

This is wonderful. I agree, much nicer than the b&w one. I love the winter light.

Plus the obligatory 'chromasia is wonderful' comment of course..

comment by djn1 at 11:57 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006

Thanks everyone, and I'm glad to see that a couple of you prefer the monochrome version :-)

As for using f/5.6: at 17mm if you focus at around 3m the DoF will extend from 1.5m to infinity. If I'd been thinking about it, I'd probably have used f/8.0, but I pretty much tend to stick with f/5.6 at this focal length.

comment by m at 12:24 AM (GMT) on 4 January, 2006

:-)

comment by EMurks at 08:38 AM (GMT) on 4 January, 2006

Gorgeous image. Love the breadth of landscape, and the aloneness of those hugging its edge...

comment by Sean (Random Panderings) at 04:44 PM (GMT) on 4 January, 2006

I love the colour one better Dave. It's much richer. The B&W needs to be more contrasty IMHO to compete. I'm a huge fan of panoramic formats so it was nice to see a perspective reminiscent of the Linhoff/Horseman 612. As for 5.6 I'd never have considered this I'm pretty much set at f16 for landscapes, although with the Sigma 10-20 on my 20D I've going back to f10 or so. Great work as usual!
Sean

comment by Wilson at 07:56 PM (GMT) on 4 January, 2006

I like this version. it's just simply surreal!

comment by reg at 11:30 PM (GMT) on 4 January, 2006

Best for a while

comment by Ryan Rahn at 01:44 AM (GMT) on 5 January, 2006

Wonderful clarity. Love the colors and lighting. The aspect ratio yields itself very well to the composition of this shot.

comment by Christine at 05:12 AM (GMT) on 5 January, 2006

I love the color version of this image. It is stunning, as always.

comment by Nikee Ghini at 09:25 PM (GMT) on 6 January, 2006

Hi Dave,
I prefer B/W in general but this one I like best in color. It's still almost monocromatic for the range is very narrow, only in the sky and in some reflections on the pebbles, but the quality of light make this image memorable.

comment by Tek at 12:54 PM (GMT) on 9 January, 2006

I love this photo, the sky and the colors are very attractive

comment by Ioannis at 07:39 PM (GMT) on 10 January, 2006

Lovely colour on this one.

Your rss feed at http://www.chromasia.com/iblog/index.xml seems to only show things up to new years day, at least on bloglines. Would you like to investigate?