<<< o >>>they ride by 26 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

This one was taken at the same time as this one and this one, and relies on the same approach; i.e. 'let's see what happens if I point a telephoto lens out of a moving car at a stupidly slow shutter speed'. Anyway, I guess that this is a technique that I find quite interesting, not least because the results, at least in terms of the details within a shot, are largely unpredictable – and I guess that's quite liberating; and I do think this is something I'll continue to experiment with.

Bottom-line though, as always: does it work? I think so, at least in some ways, but tell me what you think.

Oh, and I suspect that this may be the only photograph I've ever taken at f/32.0, not that that's at all relevant to anything, but I just thought I'd mention it ;-)

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
2.55pm on 22/1/06
Canon 20D
EF 70-200 f/4L USM
176mm (282mm equiv.)
f/32.0
0.3s
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
2x1
 
2x1 + abstract + people
comment by Ellie at 07:52 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

i like it for the dream-like quality - same as the others in the 'series'...
abstraction is fun to play with in photography as mostly images are captured 'as seen'....

comment by Dean S at 07:55 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

Nice effect David, very ghostly indeed. Have a nice weekend!

comment by flying cow at 08:15 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

i dont like it. a tad too hazy for my liking.
:(

comment by RichS at 08:32 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

I like it, but not sure why. I also prefer it to the other images, I think the composition in this one is better than the other two.

comment by Bill at 08:34 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

Love it, keep doin' it...

comment by cj at 08:36 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

I've been thinking recently that the trouble with digital cameras is that the images are just too real. I think you've just proved me wrong! Mind you there is probably some poor engineer sitting in Japan thinking 'and then they did what with my lens/sensor?'. You have to feel sorry for them.

More seriously, I think that this photo captures the way we often, in fact, see. Just vaguely aware of what is going on around us. Hazy and unfocussed, until something makes us concentrate. Your picture a few days ago of people staring out of a train showed faces the way they are in the front of a car. This picture shows what those faces are seeing.

Thanks for posting this.

comment by owen at 08:38 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

It works for me. I do prefer to see motion blur done in camera, and I think this is a great example of what can be achieved with a little trial and error.

comment by Monika at 08:55 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

i love it, it's like scene from a dream

comment by joan at 09:25 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

I like it, for its' painting like quality and colours.

comment by Peter Asquith at 10:57 PM (GMT) on 3 February, 2006

I really like this image; it reminds me of an early, aged and faded photograph.

The other day on flickr, someone made a comment about one of John Perkinson's photos that he loved it when "photography instead of capturing a moment deletes time". I think that applies here and coupled with the watercolour-like blur records the essence of the scene rather than the scene itself. Perhaps our brains store scenes in such an impressionistic way and we reconstruct the detail of our memories from those basic imprints? Maybe that's why it appeals to me?

comment by Caryn at 12:14 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

I like this effect. Artsy and visually pleasing. The colors and softness are especially nice.

comment by Todd Baker at 12:21 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

Dave...I like it because of the reasons you specify above. While I think photography is certainly about preserving memories in the form of recognizable shots of family, friends, etc, it is also about the art. Peggy Chun once told my wife that watercolors is the "medium of happy mistakes". Well, I'd say that this picture, while not a mistake, is well within the intent of that quote. Probably too deep for a friday, but I'm on my 3rd beer (even though it is American beer!). Good weekend, all!

comment by Robert #2 at 01:15 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

Yeah, what the others said. Watercolors. The almost pastel green and overlapping strokes of images give it a wet, handbrushed feel.

comment by Dan at 06:22 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

It's interesting to hear about your mindset while taking these types of photos. I can certainly relate, because it's the same way I feel about the Holga I've been playing with lately.

However, to be honest, I'm kind of tired of these. I find that interesting too, actually, because I always assumed others would enjoy the Holga images I've been producing as much as I do, but this makes me wonder if maybe it's more enjoyable for the producer (for whom these types of pictures offer a rare bit of unpredictability) than for the audience, for whom EVERY picture is a surprise until they see it. The unpredictability is nothing new for them, so it doesn't offer them as much of the thrill that it does for the photographer. But everyone else seems to have good things to say about them, so maybe it's just me that finds them somewhat uninteresting.

comment by mohammed at 06:31 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

love the colors!

comment by noushin at 07:18 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

Were there two bikers?
I love dreamy effects like this, works really well here.

comment by [t e r r o r k i t t e n] at 08:54 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

Love that dream like feeling........great to see the unpredictable especially in this increasingly predictable world. Love the colour and the lack of it if you get my drift.
Phil

comment by peter at 09:14 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

It works fine, if you ask me. It puts an abstract spin on something we pretty easily can recognise. Nicely toned, too.

comment by garyx at 09:15 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

Personally, I like this image, which is the best of the bunch you presented in my view. I’ve done similar experiments myself, and seen others doing the same, but this is the best I’ve come across to date; this one looks so dreamy, like looking out an old glass window in the fog or rain.

comment by GP at 11:25 AM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

Really good, it looks like an impressionistic painting!

comment by Micki in Virginia at 12:32 PM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

I love it! When everyone is trying for the perfect, sharpest image all the time, I LOVE the creatively planned and purposely out of focus shots. This one works great. Keep experimenting!

comment by sil at 01:07 PM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

Nice! It reminds me of a watercolor painting. :)

comment by jxiong at 02:11 PM (GMT) on 4 February, 2006

very interesting technique u used.. i am quite divided, i like the painterly feel to it but i am kinda blur as in wat the shot is tryin to tell me.. juz my 2cents eh! ;p

comment by Gary at 01:44 PM (GMT) on 5 February, 2006

love these types of shots, but not sure about this particular one, this is in essence a panning shot, and I think with those shots you need a colorful and/or a texured background, here the background is so bland and featurless that it barely takes the blur

comment by pfong at 03:41 AM (GMT) on 6 February, 2006

I love the painterly look of this. Looks like something Turner would have done.

comment by cams at 01:59 PM (GMT) on 8 February, 2006

I love effect blur and bicycle , great photography!:-)