<<< o >>>Roland GI-10 30 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

I took this last month as part of a commission to photograph the 'fuse units' in Bolton; a set of offices and studios that support the creative arts within the town. This one, as I'm sure you can see, is an area within their music studio. Not the most riveting blog shot, but a) I'm short of material to put up at the moment, and b) would like to include some sort of documentary of the more 'work' oriented photography I do as well as the creative side. Ideally, I guess I'd be happy if there were no difference between the two – i.e. my creative work was indistinguishable from any commissions I might do, but a brief to shoot a location is not the same as having a free hand to produce creative and innovative work. That said, I guess that I can work towards closing the gap between the two.

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
2.03pm on 16/2/06
Canon 20D
EF 17-40 f/4L USM
17mm (27mm equiv.)
f/4.0
1/15
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
200
no
RAW
C1 Pro
minor
 
3x2 + commissions
comment by Heiko at 09:13 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

I really like it!

comment by Tomasz from p h o t o w a l l s at 09:17 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

Experimenting with depth of field. Nice attempt!

comment by Lee at 09:30 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

I think this is cool, i'd be interested to see more of your 'work' shots!

comment by antmanbee at 09:33 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

No I'm afraid this is really rather boring. i would rather you dig deep into your past photographs on the beach in Blackpool.

comment by Johan at 09:51 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

I think this shot is a fresh breeze of difference. It's something other than your usual material and that makes me like it. I've followed your blog for 6 month now and I like it a lot but you can se a pattern. A DJN1-pattern. This one stands out from that pattern, plus I like a documentary series.

comment by Bill Hooker at 09:56 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

I'd be very interested to see a few more of your commissioned shots.

I can work towards closing the gap between the two.

I believe it was Ansel Adams who, explaining why he did commercial work, said that it gave him a set of challenges he would never think to set himself, and thus improved his ability to get the shots he wanted when he was on his own time.

comment by Sharla at 09:56 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

I like this a lot and probably for reasons that would bore many others. I have long enjoyed architectural photography (when done well) and this is an architectural shot! The perspective is perfect. Look at the building, the ramp or steps in the background, the curb in front, the distant buildings, and the entrance with signage.

Handy how the windows have been labeled for the fire department. Where are the pigeons?

The DOF wouldn't usually be in architectural photography but here it hides the details that would tell a different story. Very nice job on the lighting and composition.

comment by Bob at 10:52 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

Machines without people interacting with them seems pretty boring.

O.K., that's not quite fair; there's always the architectural aspect to it, as Sharla says--but I find the colors of the background conflicting with the foreground and hard to look at, and doesn't keep me focused on the subject.

I think this would really stand out with desaturation, a bit of contrast increase, and a lot of burning done in an arc around the right edge to lose most of the distraction of the background and some of the desk--maybe even a cold, industrial toning applied.

Nice Ansel Adams advice provided by Bill.

comment by Weston Boyd at 11:19 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

Good.

comment by SimonThePhoto at 11:33 PM (GMT) on 4 March, 2006

I like it.

comment by Robert at 12:11 AM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

Would work great as part of a brochure or other advertising for the area; I'm guessing you could tweak the color cast of the original to fit the context of whatever it was placed in.

comment by eclipse-space at 12:42 AM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

i'm ALWAYS short of material to put on ;) ; not a bad one actually.

comment by Matt Greco at 01:40 AM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

It looks liek a city block, with a skyscraper on the left.

comment by Owen B at 02:55 AM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

It's interesting that others have already made the comment about this looking like architectural photography. When the thumbnail popped up in my Newsfire window, I first thought it was a shot of some corporate buildings, with the 'fake tiltshift' effect that is quite popular at the moment applied to it (to create the impression that it's a photograph of a miniature 'model railway' sized building).

But no.

So in a totally unintentional way, this shot was interesting for a few seconds but I would concur that your eye does not like being tethered to a corporate brief as much as it likes wandering the vagaries of Brighton looking for the unusual in the ordinary...

comment by Tim at 03:00 AM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

Actually I like it too... Still i have lots of pictures of piles of electronic stuff that is mostly music making. As a small point it should actually be GI-10 not G1-10 -- the sad music geeks woun't find your photo otherwise!

comment by Kevin at 03:25 AM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

A good solid image, great depth of field use, good tones and colors and perfect detail. Nice solid shot here!

comment by Crystal at 04:57 AM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

I really like the perspective of this shot. It's nice.

comment by Brian Cavalier at 05:44 AM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

I used to work in radio so I have a good appreciation for good sound equipment. I think the shot is rather nice.

comment by djn1 at 10:27 AM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

Tim: thanks, I've retitled this one :-) As for the rest of your comments - more later.

comment by Ellie at 01:14 PM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

I love this, for what it is. Cool angle.

comment by JD at 01:51 PM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

Technically its pretty much flawless, but then what else can we expect from you? Especially when considering its a commisioned piece.

As for the subject, it doesn't really do anything for me.

But as a blog piece it lets us see another aspect of your life, and definitally was worth the entry, and more so if your lacking content matter at the moment!

comment by leova (↑) at 02:49 PM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

love it! i saw thumbnail first at photos.vfxy.com and was sure that it is city picture. looks like 7 store building :) with entrance and rooftop ! super!

comment by noushin at 04:10 PM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

Just like Leova, looking at it's icon in vfxy I thought it's a building shot too. I like how you included the round corner of the table. Really cool shot.

comment by jezblog.com at 04:24 PM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

This has a great architectural quality....er.... yeah the architecture of Mars....... with a classic Martian purple sky. I like to see commissioned photography presented as worthy of examination. Some professional missions result only in images to comply to the brief but most result in images that even out of the context deserve to be addressed in their own right. I mix some assignments into personal images on my blog. Its completely seamless...... er....... sort of.

comment by Manolo at 06:31 PM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

I like the depth of field. Very nice colors.

comment by djn1 at 08:31 PM (GMT) on 5 March, 2006

Thanks everyone.

comment by Stephen Faul at 12:01 PM (GMT) on 6 March, 2006

I'm another one that briefly thought it was a building, and whether this was intentional or not, for me it makes this image interesting.

comment by prasoon at 10:20 PM (GMT) on 6 March, 2006

nice lighting here on this one !!
guess this one is wonderful piece of hardware..

comment by Joshua at 12:59 AM (GMT) on 15 March, 2006

Crank it to 11 - you know, one higher than the rest.

comment by claudia at 01:35 PM (GMT) on 10 April, 2006

è bellissimo questo blog! complimenti!!!