<<< o >>>ceci n'est pas un 'blog shot' 28 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

First: thanks for all the great comments on yesterday's shot: they were much appreciated, not least because I don't often post photojournalistic type material, so it's good to see that it was well received.

As for this shot: I find it difficult to resist taking shots of graffiti, but after thinking of the title for this one there was no way I wasn't going to post it ;-)

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
9.29am on 26/4/06
Canon 20D
EF 70-200 f/4L USM
140mm (224mm equiv.)
f/5.6
1/2500
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
2x1
 
2x1 + graffiti
comment by Juliån at 08:44 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

We say rather " un blog " in French.
I indeed admit not to understand the link between title and photo?
You warn against portfolios which post too much, and in great quantities? That means saying that too much art kills Art.

comment by Robert at 08:45 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

I have a feeling you'll take some flak as your title indicates, but while not a moving or particularly meaningful image, it still has a gritty, urban feel that keeps it from being just a snapshot. It also makes a good inside joke for those who have followed your blog for a while.

comment by Justin Gaynor at 08:47 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

Beautiful shades of blue...nice texture.

comment by Jason Ertel at 08:48 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

The subdued colors are appealing. Excellent contrast.

Regards,
Jason

comment by djn1 at 08:49 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

Juliån: thanks, I've retitled the image. As for the title: I'll explain later ;-)

comment by Mark at 09:07 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

You being provocative again Dave? ;-)

comment by Juliån at 09:15 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

No problem, i'll be waiting for!

Have a nice evening

comment by dave at 09:17 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

'il y a beaucoup de blogs, mais seulement un chromasia!', comme Robespierre une fois a dit..!

comment by flying cow at 10:01 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

seeing that is uploaded to this, i would say it is.....

comment by thukai at 10:14 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

There is a odd mixture of great and not so great in this picture. The processing is fantastic as always. The way you make the black spots and lines stand out on the b&w wood appeals to me. The graffiti on the other hand is rubbish. No offence to you, David. I suspect that if you had found another graffiti/tag, it would have been tremendous.

comment by clarence at 10:35 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

Luv the shades of blue in this random shot.

comment by Jamey at 10:46 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

Earlier today, I showed my girlfriend the photo I intend to post tomorrow. She said she didn't get it. This mildly annoyed me so I'm resisting the urge to say the same about this shot but if I'm honest, it is what I want to say.

comment by djn1 at 11:03 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

Perhaps I needed to explain the title a bit better :-) It's a play on the ideas expressed by Magritte's Ceci n'est pas une pipe, though in this case the joke was meant to be that this is entirely a blog shot (whereas Magritte's point was that a painting of a pipe is merely an image of a pipe, not the pipe itself). I guess that a part of the (inside) joke was that photoblog's often seem random, so what better than a photograph of the word itself.

Anyway, I suspect that I was attempting to be a smart-arse with this one ;-)

comment by Jamey at 11:07 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

Yeah. Nobody likes a smart-arse. Get him, boys... ;)

comment by djn1 at 11:12 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

:-)

comment by JD at 11:59 PM (GMT) on 27 April, 2006

didn't really get the title untl you explained so I'm glad about that!!!

I wouldn't call this graffiti... its vandalism...
Ofcourse you could argue that the freedom to express themselves [the vandal] used tagging as the vent and thus create art of graffiti... But I think there is more more to graffiti than "random" words and this is why I don't class it as graffiti!

comment by mooch at 02:16 AM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Smart or not, I feel that the bus to Chromasia has left. Not only am I too late to catch it, but my ticket has expired. It's been out of date well past a month now I fear...

comment by rhys at 06:47 AM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Sometimes photographing the 'surface' can be just as revealing as photographing the heart of the matter.

comment by Dennis at 07:45 AM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Since it has the word 'random' in it I felt compelled to comment :-) This shot is obviously mostly about texture and color and both are very pleasing. Tasteful processing, indeed!

comment by bruno at 07:56 AM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

very nice shot. love that blue-gray contrast here :)

comment by Lito at 08:04 AM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

The thumbnail looks better than the original. You did a great job, but i don't like the "RANDOM"-font. But that's my opinion. What i do like... the beautiful colors and the blured sharpness. I also like the image title you have chosen. An allusion to René Magritte.

comment by perplex at 08:31 AM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Grafitti has the same effect on me. I simple have to photograph it. I especially like the Stencils that are very in fashion (if that is the right word :)

comment by Caroline at 09:17 AM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

hahah j'adore le titre, ça me fait rire.
j'ai vu une fois sur un mur "ceci n'est pas un grafiti", très marrant.

comment by Adrian at 10:19 AM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Hi everyone, and hi Dave. I've been following your posts with much pleasure for a little while but this is my first comment. Firstly, great work - thanks!

Second, this really appealed to me as I've just finished reading a book on the surrealists and before that read Susan Sontag's 'On Photography' in which she writes a lot about the surreal nature of photography. I also have a strange obsession with photographing graffiti! Great post and, although I agree that the quality of the tag itself isn't great, it makes an excellent image in the context you've chosen to present it.

I wish I'd thought of doing this first ;)

comment by Benjamin Riley at 02:04 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

This shot just doesn't quite "do it" for me. I like the colors and how the letters seem to be 3D, but something seems lacking....can't put my finger on it.

comment by Gavin at 07:48 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Hey David. I just thought you might like to know that on your about page. Top right, it says "chromasia.com/div>".

Theres something about graffiti photographs that I really like. This one really does it for me.

comment by djn1 at 08:50 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Thanks everyone, and I promise I'll make the joke a little less obscure next time ;-)

comment by Ben at 06:19 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

I think that you have a mistake in the EXIF - it says that you shot it with a 17-40mm lens, but the focal length is 140mm. But anyways, it's a very nice shot.