It's been a long week, during which I've felt the need to prop my eyes open with matchsticks on several occasions, of which this shot is an example (minus the matchsticks) ;-)
Oh, and in case you're wondering about the post-processing: I used the channel mixer to 'extract' the blue channel (which radically darkens skin tones), added a vignette, and increased the contrast with the Curves tool.
captured camera aperture shutter speed shooting mode exposure bias metering mode ISO focal length flash image quality cropped?
2.01pm on 28/4/06
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T9
f/3.5
1/130
'magnifying glass'
-1/3
pattern
80
6.3mm
no
JPEG/fine
minor
comment byDave at 08:55 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
Thanks David, are you going to comfort me when I wake in the middle of the night with this image in my head ;-) Fantastic and creepy all at the same time.
comment byjAMIE at 09:05 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
It´s absolutly crazy! :-)))
comment byFrank at 09:10 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
kinda creepy...
comment byflying cow at 09:13 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
freaky, creepy, but funky.
reminds me of gepetto.
comment byJason Wall at 09:16 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
How disturbing! ;)
comment byJonathan at 09:17 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
Thought this was some sort of wierd alien shot..... Your eye?
The very center of the macula is called the fovea centralis, an area where all of the photoreceptors are cones; there are no rods in the fovea. The fovea is the point of sharpest, most acute visual acuity. (The center of the fovea is the “foveola.”) Because the fovea has no rods, small dim objects in the dark cannot be seen if one looks directly at them. For this reason, to detect faint stars in the sky, one must look just to the side of them so that their light falls on a retinal area, containing numerous rods, outside of the macular zone.
Just a heads up to those who may not know, this is a stereoscopic 3D image (Cross your eyes and the picture in the middle becomes 3D). So have fun trying to get it to work.
Dave: Are you a fan of Tool? Their new album due out May 2nd comes with a stereoscopic image viewer built in. They also love imagery of the eye in reference to our 'third eye'. I could be way off base, but I had to ask.
On second glance it may not be stereoscopic as I first thought.
comment byMark at 10:25 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
An interesting diptych...to say the least :-)
Given yesterday's post along with this do I detect a Mr. Nightingale that is pushing the boat out a bit in certain areas? I'm keeping a close eye on this ;-)
comment byGary at 10:27 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
nicley done
comment byRobert at 11:04 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
Ye' old evil eyes are putting a hex down. Thanks for sharing the technique.
comment by doreen at 11:06 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
very creepy. i was eating lunch when i saw this! not very pleasant
comment bydjn1 at 11:09 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
Dave (and everyone else): yep, it's not exacty a relaxing image ;-)
EssPea: it's the same image repeated twice rather than a stereoscopic one. Mind you, the crossing the eyes thing is fun. And no, I've not even heard of Tool - I'll look them up.
Mark: more a case of having to be inventive in the absence of anything else to put up ;-)
comment by Deb at 11:59 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006
"Crazy frog meets lithium shortage during a flashback of a CHIP infested BPS visit" Sombre, Dominicanesque incantations of "SSR....SSR...mea culpa" (punctuated far too intermittently by a joyous "SLR! SLR!") precipitate the descent into the seventh complex of torturous, academic purgatory...(and the blight known as "punked, pink-eye")
(*And* wut Dr Meahean said)
Now shush, I'm stil constructing a story on the lady subjected to "a series of unfortunate events"....culminating in her standing at the sea wall like a French Lieutenant's Woman ...with ultimate pathos.
(By the way, the Wolfblass is excellent)
comment byJanice at 12:21 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
My eyes hurt just looking at this. You did a superb job with this. I'm sure it's exactly the way you feel.
comment by David at 12:52 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
I had been checking your photoblog for a month or so, and I've become addicted to it. And this is my first reply there, and I must say that you always manage to surprise me.
The picture is odd, is beautiful, and it's unexpected... but it's also a reward and the answer of a mistery: So that's the eye behind the camera, the eye that looks what I find here daily! Glad to meet you, eye. I envy you.
I feel a lot of comfort in the fact that you didn't used flash. It would had been painful, I guess.
comment bymiklos at 12:59 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
I tried something like this a while ago: click.
Didn't crop as close though..
This is more "bodyworlds" style... (click again). By that I mean the skin around the eyes sorta looks like muscle tissue..
Just got back from the pub; there was a laptop lying on the table in front of me and after reading the latest rubbish about the next England manager I checked out your latest image. Arresting, you've done it again. Cheers!
comment byFellow Eskimo at 02:06 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
Scary! I jumped when I saw it.
comment bychar at 02:15 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
Yes this is fairly disturbing but yet interesting.
comment byFabio Giolito at 02:39 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
oh, the person is using his/her hands to open the eye.
i can do that without touching my face =P hahaha
bizarre
comment bydave carrington at 03:59 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
How bizarre...I've just had an eye test. It seems I need reading glasses. Looks like you need new eyes..! keep smiling :~)
comment byA.R. at 04:01 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
Those eyes look purely savage! Miklos, I like the bodyworlds reference.
comment byAnvi at 05:01 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
Holy crap. Hahahah nice cropping job to up the fear factor!
And I love how you said 'magnifying glass' shooting mode :P
comment bytongue in cheek at 08:59 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
I am glad you are not the creator! Because if you had been I would have run around scared and with my eyes closed!
comment bydjn1 at 09:54 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
Thanks everyone.
miklos: I like your shot, especially the reflection in the iris. And you're right, it is quite like some of the bodyworld images: I hadn't thought of that connection.
Anvi: the T9 does have a 'magnifying glass' mode ;-)
tongue in cheek: I did take this shot. it was a bit fiddly, and this is one shot from about 50 (composition was a bit of a problem), but it is a self-portrait.
comment bybruno at 10:42 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
very grose shot man!
comment byStefano at 11:07 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
scaring
comment byshaped at 01:09 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
great shot. impressive sharpess and very nice post processed!
comment byVictor at 03:01 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
Damn it, everytime I think I have Chromasia themes catalogued, you make a new kind of shot. You are not giving us any space for innovation, taking it all for you :D
comment byMaran at 03:32 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
sure is a bit creepy!!! but i kinda like it! I'm not too sure about the coupling of the images! I know it forces people to compare the two but other than that... in this one I don't see any reason for it!
comment bymicki at 07:18 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
I was wondering if that was your eye, it might be time for a little nap.
comment bychiara at 08:46 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
Scary and a bit disturbing.
comment bydjn1 at 09:20 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006
Thanks everyone :-)
comment by m at 06:16 PM (GMT) on 30 April, 2006
I'd never have said it was human if it weren't for the explanation. You need more sleep!
comment byJoseph Yarrow at 12:45 AM (GMT) on 1 May, 2006
well...I'm disturbed! cheers!
oh, and the pictures great by the way!
comment byKristyn at 01:53 AM (GMT) on 1 May, 2006
very creative, but quite disturbing and gross. fantastic shot though.
comment by Alex James at 03:05 AM (GMT) on 2 May, 2006
I know you got a lot of "Creepy's" and "weird''s, but i think that this shot is magnificent. I would be so overwhelmed and pleased if i got a photo as strong as this. It is wonderful, congratulations. I can's say how much i like it enough. GREAT JOB. it's thrilling.
It's been a long week, during which I've felt the need to prop my eyes open with matchsticks on several occasions, of which this shot is an example (minus the matchsticks) ;-)
Oh, and in case you're wondering about the post-processing: I used the channel mixer to 'extract' the blue channel (which radically darkens skin tones), added a vignette, and increased the contrast with the Curves tool.
camera
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
focal length
flash
image quality
cropped?
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T9
f/3.5
1/130
'magnifying glass'
-1/3
pattern
80
6.3mm
no
JPEG/fine
minor
Thanks David, are you going to comfort me when I wake in the middle of the night with this image in my head ;-) Fantastic and creepy all at the same time.
It´s absolutly crazy! :-)))
kinda creepy...
freaky, creepy, but funky.
reminds me of gepetto.
How disturbing! ;)
Thought this was some sort of wierd alien shot..... Your eye?
I'm sure I can see your fovea centralis
The very center of the macula is called the fovea centralis, an area where all of the photoreceptors are cones; there are no rods in the fovea. The fovea is the point of sharpest, most acute visual acuity. (The center of the fovea is the “foveola.”) Because the fovea has no rods, small dim objects in the dark cannot be seen if one looks directly at them. For this reason, to detect faint stars in the sky, one must look just to the side of them so that their light falls on a retinal area, containing numerous rods, outside of the macular zone.
Wow thats scary - so glad this isn't gonna be the last thing I see before I go to bed >.<
Just a heads up to those who may not know, this is a stereoscopic 3D image (Cross your eyes and the picture in the middle becomes 3D). So have fun trying to get it to work.
Dave: Are you a fan of Tool? Their new album due out May 2nd comes with a stereoscopic image viewer built in. They also love imagery of the eye in reference to our 'third eye'. I could be way off base, but I had to ask.
On second glance it may not be stereoscopic as I first thought.
An interesting diptych...to say the least :-)
Given yesterday's post along with this do I detect a Mr. Nightingale that is pushing the boat out a bit in certain areas? I'm keeping a close eye on this ;-)
nicley done
Ye' old evil eyes are putting a hex down. Thanks for sharing the technique.
very creepy. i was eating lunch when i saw this! not very pleasant
Dave (and everyone else): yep, it's not exacty a relaxing image ;-)
EssPea: it's the same image repeated twice rather than a stereoscopic one. Mind you, the crossing the eyes thing is fun. And no, I've not even heard of Tool - I'll look them up.
Mark: more a case of having to be inventive in the absence of anything else to put up ;-)
"Crazy frog meets lithium shortage during a flashback of a CHIP infested BPS visit" Sombre, Dominicanesque incantations of "SSR....SSR...mea culpa" (punctuated far too intermittently by a joyous "SLR! SLR!") precipitate the descent into the seventh complex of torturous, academic purgatory...(and the blight known as "punked, pink-eye")
(*And* wut Dr Meahean said)
Now shush, I'm stil constructing a story on the lady subjected to "a series of unfortunate events"....culminating in her standing at the sea wall like a French Lieutenant's Woman ...with ultimate pathos.
(By the way, the Wolfblass is excellent)
My eyes hurt just looking at this. You did a superb job with this. I'm sure it's exactly the way you feel.
I had been checking your photoblog for a month or so, and I've become addicted to it. And this is my first reply there, and I must say that you always manage to surprise me.
The picture is odd, is beautiful, and it's unexpected... but it's also a reward and the answer of a mistery: So that's the eye behind the camera, the eye that looks what I find here daily! Glad to meet you, eye. I envy you.
I feel a lot of comfort in the fact that you didn't used flash. It would had been painful, I guess.
I tried something like this a while ago: click.
Didn't crop as close though..
This is more "bodyworlds" style... (click again). By that I mean the skin around the eyes sorta looks like muscle tissue..
Scary almost!
Just got back from the pub; there was a laptop lying on the table in front of me and after reading the latest rubbish about the next England manager I checked out your latest image. Arresting, you've done it again. Cheers!
Scary! I jumped when I saw it.
Yes this is fairly disturbing but yet interesting.
oh, the person is using his/her hands to open the eye.
i can do that without touching my face =P hahaha
bizarre
How bizarre...I've just had an eye test. It seems I need reading glasses. Looks like you need new eyes..! keep smiling :~)
Those eyes look purely savage! Miklos, I like the bodyworlds reference.
Holy crap. Hahahah nice cropping job to up the fear factor!
And I love how you said 'magnifying glass' shooting mode :P
I am glad you are not the creator! Because if you had been I would have run around scared and with my eyes closed!
Thanks everyone.
miklos: I like your shot, especially the reflection in the iris. And you're right, it is quite like some of the bodyworld images: I hadn't thought of that connection.
Anvi: the T9 does have a 'magnifying glass' mode ;-)
tongue in cheek: I did take this shot. it was a bit fiddly, and this is one shot from about 50 (composition was a bit of a problem), but it is a self-portrait.
very grose shot man!
scaring
great shot. impressive sharpess and very nice post processed!
Damn it, everytime I think I have Chromasia themes catalogued, you make a new kind of shot. You are not giving us any space for innovation, taking it all for you :D
I thought the eyes were from a poster!
sure is a bit creepy!!! but i kinda like it! I'm not too sure about the coupling of the images! I know it forces people to compare the two but other than that... in this one I don't see any reason for it!
I was wondering if that was your eye, it might be time for a little nap.
Scary and a bit disturbing.
Thanks everyone :-)
I'd never have said it was human if it weren't for the explanation. You need more sleep!
well...I'm disturbed! cheers!
oh, and the pictures great by the way!
very creative, but quite disturbing and gross. fantastic shot though.
I know you got a lot of "Creepy's" and "weird''s, but i think that this shot is magnificent. I would be so overwhelmed and pleased if i got a photo as strong as this. It is wonderful, congratulations. I can's say how much i like it enough. GREAT JOB. it's thrilling.