<<< o >>>a long week 42 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

It's been a long week, during which I've felt the need to prop my eyes open with matchsticks on several occasions, of which this shot is an example (minus the matchsticks) ;-)

Oh, and in case you're wondering about the post-processing: I used the channel mixer to 'extract' the blue channel (which radically darkens skin tones), added a vignette, and increased the contrast with the Curves tool.

captured
camera
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
focal length
flash
image quality
cropped?
2.01pm on 28/4/06
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T9
f/3.5
1/130
'magnifying glass'
-1/3
pattern
80
6.3mm
no
JPEG/fine
minor
 
non standard + people + self-portrait
comment by Dave at 08:55 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Thanks David, are you going to comfort me when I wake in the middle of the night with this image in my head ;-) Fantastic and creepy all at the same time.

comment by jAMIE at 09:05 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

It´s absolutly crazy! :-)))

comment by Frank at 09:10 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

kinda creepy...

comment by flying cow at 09:13 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

freaky, creepy, but funky.
reminds me of gepetto.

comment by Jason Wall at 09:16 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

How disturbing! ;)

comment by Jonathan at 09:17 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Thought this was some sort of wierd alien shot..... Your eye?

comment by Doctor D.G Mehean (CSE Biology) at 09:23 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

I'm sure I can see your fovea centralis


The very center of the macula is called the fovea centralis, an area where all of the photoreceptors are cones; there are no rods in the fovea.  The fovea is the point of sharpest, most acute visual acuity.  (The center of the fovea is the “foveola.”)  Because the fovea has no rods, small dim objects in the dark cannot be seen if one looks directly at them.  For this reason, to detect faint stars in the sky, one must look just to the side of them so that their light falls on a retinal area, containing numerous rods, outside of the macular zone.

comment by Jem at 09:28 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Wow thats scary - so glad this isn't gonna be the last thing I see before I go to bed >.<

comment by EssPea | Photography at 09:31 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Just a heads up to those who may not know, this is a stereoscopic 3D image (Cross your eyes and the picture in the middle becomes 3D). So have fun trying to get it to work.

Dave: Are you a fan of Tool? Their new album due out May 2nd comes with a stereoscopic image viewer built in. They also love imagery of the eye in reference to our 'third eye'. I could be way off base, but I had to ask.

comment by EssPea | Photography at 09:33 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

On second glance it may not be stereoscopic as I first thought.

comment by Mark at 10:25 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

An interesting diptych...to say the least :-)

Given yesterday's post along with this do I detect a Mr. Nightingale that is pushing the boat out a bit in certain areas? I'm keeping a close eye on this ;-)

comment by Gary at 10:27 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

nicley done

comment by Robert at 11:04 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Ye' old evil eyes are putting a hex down. Thanks for sharing the technique.

comment by doreen at 11:06 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

very creepy. i was eating lunch when i saw this! not very pleasant

comment by djn1 at 11:09 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

Dave (and everyone else): yep, it's not exacty a relaxing image ;-)

EssPea: it's the same image repeated twice rather than a stereoscopic one. Mind you, the crossing the eyes thing is fun. And no, I've not even heard of Tool - I'll look them up.

Mark: more a case of having to be inventive in the absence of anything else to put up ;-)

comment by Deb at 11:59 PM (GMT) on 28 April, 2006

"Crazy frog meets lithium shortage during a flashback of a CHIP infested BPS visit" Sombre, Dominicanesque incantations of "SSR....SSR...mea culpa" (punctuated far too intermittently by a joyous "SLR! SLR!") precipitate the descent into the seventh complex of torturous, academic purgatory...(and the blight known as "punked, pink-eye")

(*And* wut Dr Meahean said)

Now shush, I'm stil constructing a story on the lady subjected to "a series of unfortunate events"....culminating in her standing at the sea wall like a French Lieutenant's Woman ...with ultimate pathos.

(By the way, the Wolfblass is excellent)

comment by Janice at 12:21 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

My eyes hurt just looking at this. You did a superb job with this. I'm sure it's exactly the way you feel.

comment by David at 12:52 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

I had been checking your photoblog for a month or so, and I've become addicted to it. And this is my first reply there, and I must say that you always manage to surprise me.

The picture is odd, is beautiful, and it's unexpected... but it's also a reward and the answer of a mistery: So that's the eye behind the camera, the eye that looks what I find here daily! Glad to meet you, eye. I envy you.

I feel a lot of comfort in the fact that you didn't used flash. It would had been painful, I guess.

comment by miklos at 12:59 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

I tried something like this a while ago: click.
Didn't crop as close though..

This is more "bodyworlds" style... (click again). By that I mean the skin around the eyes sorta looks like muscle tissue..

comment by Mohammed Adenwala at 01:12 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Scary almost!

comment by Lex at 01:36 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Just got back from the pub; there was a laptop lying on the table in front of me and after reading the latest rubbish about the next England manager I checked out your latest image. Arresting, you've done it again. Cheers!

comment by Fellow Eskimo at 02:06 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Scary! I jumped when I saw it.

comment by char at 02:15 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Yes this is fairly disturbing but yet interesting.

comment by Fabio Giolito at 02:39 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

oh, the person is using his/her hands to open the eye.
i can do that without touching my face =P hahaha
bizarre

comment by dave carrington at 03:59 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

How bizarre...I've just had an eye test. It seems I need reading glasses. Looks like you need new eyes..! keep smiling :~)

comment by A.R. at 04:01 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Those eyes look purely savage! Miklos, I like the bodyworlds reference.

comment by Anvi at 05:01 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Holy crap. Hahahah nice cropping job to up the fear factor!
And I love how you said 'magnifying glass' shooting mode :P

comment by tongue in cheek at 08:59 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

I am glad you are not the creator! Because if you had been I would have run around scared and with my eyes closed!

comment by djn1 at 09:54 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Thanks everyone.

miklos: I like your shot, especially the reflection in the iris. And you're right, it is quite like some of the bodyworld images: I hadn't thought of that connection.

Anvi: the T9 does have a 'magnifying glass' mode ;-)

tongue in cheek: I did take this shot. it was a bit fiddly, and this is one shot from about 50 (composition was a bit of a problem), but it is a self-portrait.

comment by bruno at 10:42 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

very grose shot man!

comment by Stefano at 11:07 AM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

scaring

comment by shaped at 01:09 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

great shot. impressive sharpess and very nice post processed!

comment by Victor at 03:01 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Damn it, everytime I think I have Chromasia themes catalogued, you make a new kind of shot. You are not giving us any space for innovation, taking it all for you :D

comment by Maran at 03:32 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

I thought the eyes were from a poster!

comment by JD at 07:07 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

sure is a bit creepy!!! but i kinda like it! I'm not too sure about the coupling of the images! I know it forces people to compare the two but other than that... in this one I don't see any reason for it!

comment by micki at 07:18 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

I was wondering if that was your eye, it might be time for a little nap.

comment by chiara at 08:46 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Scary and a bit disturbing.

comment by djn1 at 09:20 PM (GMT) on 29 April, 2006

Thanks everyone :-)

comment by m at 06:16 PM (GMT) on 30 April, 2006

I'd never have said it was human if it weren't for the explanation. You need more sleep!

comment by Joseph Yarrow at 12:45 AM (GMT) on 1 May, 2006

well...I'm disturbed! cheers!

oh, and the pictures great by the way!

comment by Kristyn at 01:53 AM (GMT) on 1 May, 2006

very creative, but quite disturbing and gross. fantastic shot though.

comment by Alex James at 03:05 AM (GMT) on 2 May, 2006

I know you got a lot of "Creepy's" and "weird''s, but i think that this shot is magnificent. I would be so overwhelmed and pleased if i got a photo as strong as this. It is wonderful, congratulations. I can's say how much i like it enough. GREAT JOB. it's thrilling.