<<< o >>>the absence of dreams 39 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

I mentioned in a comment the other day that when I edit a shot I don't add in anything that isn't there; i.e. I wouldn't add a dramatic sky from one shot to a striking foreground from another. However, there are occasions when I've blended two (or more) shots, and this is an example of the same technique. The original included a few people to the right of the girl, and despite numerous attempts to process this shot they remained a distraction. So, rather than black out the background altogether I borrowed a section of the wall from this shot.

The inspiration for this style of image comes from Mike Regnier, a fine art photographer that I've long admired. If you're even vaguely interested in this shot, then you should take a good look around Mike's site (there are various sections, including a blog) as he's produced some wonderful images that truly put this one to shame.

So, to forestall the inevitable, this isn't a straight photograph, but, in my opinion at least, it works a lot better this way; mostly, I suppose, because of the story in my head as I took the shot - my reaction to her expression, and the sense I had that she seemed rather lost. This is a style that I'm going to explore in the future, so I'd be definitely interested to hear your thoughts.

Oh, and if you're interested, the original is here:

.../archives/the_absence_of_dreams.php

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
8.59pm on 20/5/06
Canon 20D
EF 70-200 f/4L USM
168mm (269mm equiv.)
f/5.6
1/400
aperture priority
-1/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
1x1
 
1x1 + people [portraiture] + digital art
comment by Adrian Hudson at 10:07 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

A wow! image... ghostly, arresting, beautiful! More like this please Dave.

comment by shooter at 10:10 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

Excellent image, to me almost reminiscent of David Hamilton, Sara Moon et al, has that painterly feel, you are obviously very well versed in PS and it shows in this image, will look forward to the next installement, in closing this is a lovely shot.

comment by ROB at 10:12 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

Well you have out done yourself with this one. Amazing processing. Her expression and all the grime really makes an incredible feeling composition.

comment by nuno f at 10:28 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

To tell you the truth, both the original and this version are fantastic. The composition really helped and the innocent look of the girl make this picture for me. Excellent work!

comment by Judith Polakoff at 10:32 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

I think this works beautifully. Initially I thought she was looking through a very grimy window, so the combination of shots wasn't obvious to me at all, which is probably the result you were hoping for. I'd love to see more like this.

comment by Marius Muscalu at 10:33 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

nice but not as good as your last portrait...

comment by coxcorns at 11:01 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

It scared me ..

comment by Paul at 11:02 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

I hate this! It scares the crap out of me! Not a slur on your photographic or PP technique, it's just too scary and disturbing to look at for me.

comment by thukai at 11:07 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

Beautiful! Great work I must say, very exiting. I cannot wait for you to explore this technique further :)

comment by Rui at 11:26 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

gorgeous! :)
what a awesome portrait

comment by mooch at 11:32 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

Looks like a still from "Silent Hill". Eerie and rather gripping.

comment by Marinus at 11:48 PM (GMT) on 28 May, 2006

I really like this picture. Its very scary, could be from the movie,the ring 3 orso. And thanks for the link to Mark Regnier, is a very cool site. And gives me a lot of inspiration too. Specially those black and white ones with animals.
( Can't work with people myself, they make me nervous. )

comment by rambohoho at 12:04 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

she seemes not only to be lost, but also to be scared and that has directed to her hate.

comment by Dacian at 12:37 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

wow, impressive. i like the original too, i can't decide which one i like more.

comment by Joseph at 01:05 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

the love bite on her neck puts a softer feel on the picture. thanks alot for showing us Mike Regniers work.

comment by Dave F at 01:06 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

I read the title from the rss feed and said to myself, "this is going to be depressing," and sure enough, its a downer! I like to try to deduce from the title what your images will bring. I don't know why, but with this one, I was sort of hoping I had guessed wrong. Now I am wondering if you knew anything about the girl in the portrait to title it that way, or is it simply your perception of her? Great shot btw!

comment by Al at 01:24 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

I was looking for a silent photograf for long time, a shot which built on inner silence. I've never found it... until today. With this picture it is proved that a silent picture can be taken only by working on portraits. Excellent, awesome.....

comment by Mal at 02:16 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

The initial image tells a story all of its own - so I am slightly bemused why you wanted to alter the image in this way however, you have created a totally different feel and thought provoking blend and it works so well. In my humble opinion "One of your best". Great work. Mal

comment by Matt Simpson at 03:27 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

I dunno man, that first paragraph basically says:

"I don't manipulate the composition, but I manipulated the composition."

To each their own, but I like the original shot just fine. The one posted is nice for what it is but it seems less photography to me as it does digital art.

comment by Jessyel Ty Gonzalez at 04:39 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

All this and you didn't even clone out that hair going across her nose. For shame, David, haha :-)

comment by Fabio Giolito at 05:05 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

This one is so not like your shots =P

since you are talking about "add in anything that isn't there" check this guy's work: http://www.taylorjames.com

it's amazing!! So are your work.

comment by Bob at 06:08 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

This image is...well...quite special. No words are adequate. Looking forward to future "explorations".

comment by David Grundy at 07:14 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

It would be interesting to know whether she knew her picture might be significantly enhanced, and gave permission for that. If so, you could disregard most of my comments below.

I like this as a piece of art. And I think you have done a great job in producing an image with a very specific feel. Well done!

At the same time, I hope nobody ever takes a picture of me and changes so much the impression I might make on someone who hasn't seem me before. The textures originally from the wall, which now can be read as features of her skin, seem to me to add an implication of being poor, unwashed, and/or recovering from injury, which I think wasn't there at all in the original picture. I agree that on a closer look I could interpret this is being a woman looking through a dirty window rather than being dirty herself, but personally I don't see it that way naturally, and my first impression (unwashed/poor/battered) remains with me. I feel uncomfortable with the idea that my first impression of her - which would influence my impression if I saw her in future - doesn't correspond all that well with anything I could ever have observed in reality, at any moment of her life.

I see this as different from just recording (however selectively) what's in front of you. I think in this case the textures are an important part of the feel of the picture, and it seems to me that perhaps this time you really have added something that wasn't there originally. I'm not saying that's wrong in itself (I don't think I know what's right or wrong in this field) but it might not be in line with what you normally intend.

comment by mihai at 08:19 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

indeed its not the other photographs u posted...but great tones, those eyes green paralize u...the change of tones from face to forehead ...great job...

comment by vincent at 08:25 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

The image looks really good. Blending this background with the portrait of that girl conveys a 2D felling to the image close to modern painting. I wish you would have taken something even more flat for background, the line going from the forehead to the right end of the picture on the concret part brings back a sense of perspective that is not necessary in my point of view.
Thanks again for an other great picture.


comment by navin harish at 08:38 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

Nice shot indeed and while some purists may say that this is not photography, I think you have done a good job.

comment by Jon Rouston at 08:52 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

I like the post processed one, but for me the original is just as good, if not better. It seems to tell more of a story, a person stopped in time, whilst life goes on around them.

Don't get me wrong, both are fantastic and far superior to anything I could do!

comment by San Sebastian at 10:52 AM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

It looks like a terror film, nice job.

comment by Bart at 01:29 PM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

I really like it. Somehow reminds me of Silent Hill

comment by micki at 02:58 PM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

Very intense!

comment by derLitograph at 03:58 PM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

i like the unprocessed much more :-) Looks very warm

comment by Roy at 04:27 PM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

The original surely hints at a story: the tired eyes, the distant gaze, the tell-tale signs of a recent passionate encounter, but whether it really is this person's story or not we cannot say.
Your consummate use of Photoshop to create an illustration from this image cries out for a book or album title in the top right corner. A different story is told here and, once more, it is left to our imagination to decide what it might be.
For some reason, I am reminded of Steve McCurry's famous 1985 portrait of Sharbat Gula (known as the 'Afghan Girl'). A powerful portrait made all the more powerful by knowledge of the circumstances of the subject. I'm not sure what I'm getting at here, but it's something to do with context...
Nice PS work though.

comment by Karl Baumann at 04:49 PM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

Nice technique and PP but the motive is just boring. :-)

comment by chiara at 06:30 PM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

Dramatic and emotional. Makes me worry and wonder what could have happened to this poor girl.

comment by AndresB. at 06:52 PM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

Well, here is a demostration that photos are an ilusion. No matter the level of interview in the image. There is always the perspective of the photographer, the exposure chosen, etc.
I like this one a lot. There is no time in it. I can imagen a lot of stories from this photo. The way she looks alow us to get inside of her vulnerability. The tones and colors seem to fade out, like her expression on her face. Great.

comment by AndresB. at 07:11 PM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

I'm lookin the original and I can't stop lookin her. Very intrestin girl. The expression in her eyes take all my atention. Different images, different stories, both are for me an imitation and an interpretation of who was there. Never the real person.

comment by djn1 at 07:16 PM (GMT) on 29 May, 2006

Thanks everyone. As this is a style of work I intend to further explore it was good to see this first attempt being well received.

comment by m at 01:02 PM (GMT) on 30 May, 2006

Your going down that spooky road again!

comment by noonan at 04:38 PM (GMT) on 5 June, 2006

stirring, stunning, quite, lovely....
This is an amazing piece. I really love the technique.