<<< o >>>the four seasons 48 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

For those of you in the "but this isn't a photograph!" camp, my apologies, but I felt like posting something a bit different today.

This one started life as a fireworks shot. Subsequent amendments include motion blurring the original and producing four different colour schemes on a seasonal theme: spring, summer, autumn and winter.

As always, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts, not least because it's rare for me to post something quite this abstract.

Anyway, let me know what you think.

 
abstract + digital art + non standard
comment by Stephan van der Wulp at 09:41 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

This one is hard to explain. First I dislike but now when I look longer it's getting better. So my conclusion is thats perfect... So simple and apart. I like it!

comment by Aric at 09:51 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

It's wonderful. I see this as a very large print, perhaps arranged into a horizontal line.

comment by Arthur at 09:53 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

Wow. Abstract, indeed.

I do like the colour schemes, though.

comment by Fellow Eskimo at 09:54 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

Colors are interesting...like a weird form of plaid.

comment by JOhn Washington at 09:57 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

What is a photograph anyway ? of course I'm going to like it because I personally love abstract work.

I'd like to see more photographers experimenting with non representational images.

Good work

comment by quis at 09:58 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

1 and 4 move when I look at them. Plus they remind me a little of the multicoloured bar on www.kottke.org. Interesting though...

comment by EssPea | Photography at 10:06 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

Intereesting take on the title

comment by Jennifer at 10:12 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

Reminds me of awful bri-nylon shirts my mum used to wear - so it doesn't do a great deal for me! But hey it's good to experiment and it's what floats your boat! ;-)

comment by wesley hargrove at 10:22 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

very very cool. Quis: they move for me too.

comment by skenz at 10:24 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

I'm sorry, but I don't like them...

comment by edward at 10:26 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

Can we see the original?

comment by Gavin at 10:27 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

Love it.

comment by doreen at 10:41 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

the coolest thing about these is that when you look at them, they seem to ripple.

comment by CurlyToes at 10:51 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

hmmm. not sure. I have no problems at all with people posting "non-photographs"; I never understood what the problem with it would be anyway. I sorta like it, but at the same time, it doesn't hold my attention. I dunno, maybe there's not enough variation in the processing. That said, it's nicely simple and I can imagine it would be quite saleable as a canvas work-of-art for the modern home :)

comment by Mark Palmer at 11:00 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

I like it. It plays with my eyes and draws me into it.

comment by Doug at 11:19 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

Wooah just installed Windows Vista and the 1st page i went to was this, i was about's to warn you about some compatability issues till i read the comment hehe

i like it... i think :)

comment by Matt at 11:30 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

Not enamoured at all. I know I only seem to post when I don't like anything but really, what's the point?

I just don't get it. Sorry

comment by tony at 11:48 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2006

I didn't pick the season relevance until I read your pic notes but I can see it now. I like them due to the colour toning and abstract feel. Great work, these would probably looked great framed together.

comment by Benjamin Chait at 12:01 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I think it's great that you're doing something different for a change. Definitely enjoying this one, though I'll be glad to see more "standard" photos. But like I said, a good change from the ordinary!

comment by Jeff Ambrose at 01:01 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

Love the simplicity, would looke great on a wall as a set.

comment by Jose Brito at 01:30 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I admire your effort to do something different and this is actually quite original, but it just doesn't really work for me... But then again, it's a good alternative to the same-old-firework-themed-photo! =)

comment by geckonia at 01:50 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I was hoping you'd go abstract with these firework shots, but I never imagined how creative you would be! Bravo!

comment by Geoff at 01:57 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I'm not sure.... I love the colours of winter, but I'm ambivilant about the series. Maybe it'll grow on me...

comment by Joey at 02:50 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I like abstract shots. I get into motion blurs. To me, it works best when there is a little bit of reality to mix with the abstraction. What do yall think?

comment by Jessyel Ty Gonzalez at 04:56 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

If it was produced with a slow shutter speed, I still wouldn't get it. Motion trail from Photoshop just means you've made an image rather than a photograph. This is total manipulation of an image beyond your usual flair (and most of us photobloggers, including me).

This can be emulated in PS with around four clicks of the mouse. And for those of you who hail that abstracts and life are about randomness... Photoshop has a 'random' feature as well. There's a fine line... I think this image just broke out of the photography sphere.

comment by Katie at 06:09 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

Love them. Want them. Would lay them out large format in my imaginary FLW house on an interior wall or maybe on the four sides of a central fireplace. I truly enjoy your photography, your mastery of post-processing skills, and your eye for the extraordinary. turning something like fireworks into this beauty? wow.

comment by Steve at 10:31 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I think the fact that I can't view the whole arrangement on my screen a thte same time kinda ruins it a bit for me. On the other hand, it would look great on a wall of a modern aparmtment or something like that.

comment by mooch at 10:40 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I like the clean lines. I do care about what is posted on a 'photoblog' per se and this for me really is of the graphic art stable. Still, different and no less pleasing but perhaps the wrong forum.

comment by Craig Wilson at 11:46 AM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

Very interesting, I love it! Colours really jump out at me.

comment by m at 12:16 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

If all 4 could be seen at the same time the images would make a great piece for display. It's a fine piece of original art work and I like it. For the debate they're no longer photo's.

comment by Jaap at 12:41 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

Far Out Man! :-P

comment by Ashley Henderson at 12:52 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I agree with a lot of the commenters who say that it would look great as a series in a gallery. However, I am personally a big fan of your more traditional photographs, rather than the abstract work like this, as well as the abstract shots that John has been posting lately. But I can't fault your technical skill because I don't like the subject matter. So, that being said, great job, but I look forward to more "regular" photos soon.

comment by JD at 01:08 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

abstract indeed... interesting to see what colours represent the seasons to you... wouldn't have been the choices I'd have made!!
I really don't understand why we bother calling them photoblogs... so restrictive...
then again "Digital Image Blogs" aint so great.. Di Blog does sound a bit better tho!

comment by Kyle at 02:35 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I liked them until I realized they were all the same image with a different color scheme. If each had a unique source chosen to compliment the respective season, it might be more interesting. As for "four clicks"... ease is not neccessarily inversely proportional to beauty.

comment by Jessyel Ty Gonzalez at 03:44 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

Kyle: I wasn't saying the four clicks would be easy to do (although, I will say it now - they would be), but rather how I would NOT need an actual photograph to emulate this look. An empty canvas, four clicks, and bam, I have this or something very similar. Not saying that's bad... Just that for a PHOTOblog (and one with such a storied history of its digital manipulations), I can't quite agree with this image. 'Tis all.

comment by Rick at 04:44 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

the best part about chrosmasia is your willingness to experiment and show us something different. well done!

comment by Jukka at 06:10 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

Some artists do it by paint, others use digital cameras ;-)

comment by John at 06:35 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

Excellent graphic arts work.

comment by m at 08:43 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

It only takes one click to take a photograph!

comment by Jide Alakija at 10:02 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

This is photography as you have used a photographic medium to capture the image. The fact that you have manipulated this image doesn't change the fact that it was first captured as a photograph so to me it remains a photograph, just manipulated.

Nice work David.

comment by Iron Flatline at 10:18 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I enjoy scrolling up and down quickly, it leaves me feeling slightly "tripped out."

comment by Bob at 10:49 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

Though I strongly disagree with Jessyel's expectation that photoblogs need be a sacred box that you can only put photographs into, it's obvious that this would be trivial to do in any image making program, even without an photo as the starting point. So what? Better to judge "images" on concept and merit as a finished work.
More to the heart and spirit of the matter, however, I think is the critique from CurlyToes.

comment by djn1 at 11:36 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

Thanks everyone, and I'll pick up a few of your points on my next entry.

comment by Sharla at 11:51 PM (GMT) on 25 September, 2006

I think they're well done and the angle is excellent. Your choice of colors to carry your vision is good, with the possible exception of Autumn that seems a bit too harsh to me. I don't like the presentation here but your limitation is our screens so what can you do without losing the detail? It's been mentioned but I totally agree: a series on a wall would be the best presentation.

comment by Eric Hegwer at 12:42 AM (GMT) on 26 September, 2006

Interesting work. I like where you are going with this, and would like to encourage you to try more.
I tried an alternate way of looking at these by opening them on my laptop and then turning the screen 90 degrees. I'm not sure if I like that better.

comment by Benjamim at 09:40 AM (GMT) on 26 September, 2006

wow
and...you don´t need to talk about the 4 season.
it´s obvious

comment by sarah at 10:52 AM (GMT) on 27 September, 2006

great colour harmonies.

comment by mohammed adenwala at 05:11 AM (GMT) on 20 October, 2006

Lovely colors and patterns!