<<< o >>>the movement of light #1 43 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

This is the first of two abstract pieces, neither of which are perfect, but both of which I like. And before anyone mentions CGI or vector graphics, they are relatively straight photographs. As for what and how: I'll post more details tomorrow.

captured
camera
lens
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
9.37pm on 12/10/06
Canon 20D
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
f/16.0
1/30
manual
n/a
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
minor
 
3x2 + abstract [smoke]
comment by steve at 04:46 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

love it. can't wait to hear more details on the process

comment by Parker at 04:56 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Is this another smoke photo? Those are cool. And this is cool, however you did it. It would make a great computer wallpaper (especially for a Mac)!

comment by Paul at 04:57 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Lovely image. Tell us a bit more please!

comment by Photorama at 05:00 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Hi djn, Is this smoke? How do you make this?

comment by Joe at 05:05 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

This is a very exciting pic, and will be looking forward to more details.

comment by Richard Houtby at 05:11 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Wow, nice capture.
If that's smoke... real nice PP on that one to make it look more like a solid. Did you overlay a find edge layer or something? Pretty cool dude!
BTW, nice compositional shape.
I'm also looking forward to more information.

comment by Robbmc at 05:16 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

*cough* invert *cough*

:D Sorry DJN, really great shape you got here. It can be painstaking getting a good one.

comment by John at 05:27 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Very intriguing; makes me think of blown glass.

comment by nesty at 05:34 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Nice photo. Hope you can share some technical aspects of the shot!

comment by Daniel Seguin at 05:39 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Ooooo, do tell! Can't wait to read more. You're always blowing my mind with these fab smoke shots, so really lookin' forward to it.

comment by Darren at 05:48 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

This is interesting, because it was back when you posted all the smoke pictures when I first heard of Chromasia. Someone had blogged about how cool they were and I've been a constant visitor since.

I like the interlocking shapes in this one.

comment by Mark at 05:58 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

This is one of your best smoke images to date Dave. Wonderful blown class effect.

comment by Ninu at 06:16 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

I am just going to take a stab at it Dave, you took this smoke shot against a black background, inverted the tone so you have that solid white bg and then used maybe a few filters/masks in order to achieve this amazing greenish hue. It does look like blown glass and the way you caught the smoke **if it is smoke anyway** is absolutely awesome! Nice shot for the day :-)

comment by edina at 06:27 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

this is beautiful! it looks like glass...

comment by Crash at 06:27 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

i love it .... whatever it is ! blown glass ? smoke ??

comment by Alistair - Digiphotology at 06:40 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Amazing what you can do with those roll-ups!

comment by Crash at 06:45 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

i love it .... whatever it is ! blown glass ? smoke ??

comment by Joseph at 07:22 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Apart from the beauty of the shape and the colors, I love the fact that the smoke has got a sheen to it, so I'm guessing that you've added a pretty heavy curves adjustment on there, aswell as inverting the image.
did you use an incence stick to produce the smoke?

comment by m at 07:55 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

It looks like something "alive" is within. :-)

comment by Ross at 08:33 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Wow.. I could look at this for hours.

comment by Robert at 08:53 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Gorgeous. I can't ever get the focus exactly right on the smoke photos, so they get a little soft. This one make me want to have another go at it.

comment by JD at 08:54 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Somebody said inverted already, and I thought that's what it was, but it's defiitely not a straight invert cos when you invert it back, the smoke looks too purple. So I think ther's (one step) more to it than that......

comment by Stuart at 09:43 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

I was thinking ink or food colouring dripped into water...

comment by Geoff at 11:24 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

I remember you posted some links to smoke tutorials last time you posted these sort of shots. I've never given it a go, but I'm keen to try. I think I shall seek out some tutorials and give it a go.

comment by Patrick at 11:28 PM (GMT) on 13 October, 2006

Hi David. It reminds me of 2 other smoke shots you posted some while ago. The post-process on this one is even better and I really like the colour and reflections you gave it. But I think I prefered the shape of the pink one better (for those wanting to see, have a look at the thumbs page, you'll find it).
Tell us how you managed to focus on the smoke. did you take hundreds of shots to get this one right? I know it's hard cause I've tried it myself: here
Really not an easy thing to do ...
Thank for keeping up the good quality.

comment by mooch at 02:28 AM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

Smoke inverted. Always works for me. I like the crisp finish.

comment by Joe at 03:39 AM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

Man, this is incredible! I for one am looking forward to hearing more abot this one. Great work

comment by San sebastian at 06:00 AM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

Great image....im waiting for process.

comment by Jon at 07:40 AM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

That's great. Looking forward to the details, I'd like to have a go at this :)

comment by Chris at 08:03 AM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

I've always loved photographs that move into the realm of abstract art. These smoke forms are quite interesting. I'd be quite interested in knowing your smoke source. One of my favorite abstract shots here.

comment by Mike at 09:06 AM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

Fabulous image - I guess the clue is in the reference to smoke but the details of how you did it will be very interesting.

comment by braesikalla at 11:31 AM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

Ah, ...and that is what you call not perfect in your introduction? Great abstract!

comment by Thomas at 02:42 PM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

Impressive picture! For me that's rather perfect. Would love to get more details on the history and postprocessing of that shot...

comment by Photo Traces at 05:17 PM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

i do not even what to know how it's done, i just want to enjoy it, love it

comment by geckonia at 07:30 PM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

This is fantastic... a beautiful visual journey that leaves something to the imagination.

comment by John Zeweniuk at 07:55 PM (GMT) on 14 October, 2006

mmm.. l really like this one.. it looks like a glass sculpture

comment by Nils K. Windisch (netomer) at 01:44 PM (GMT) on 15 October, 2006

amazing!

comment by Mary at 01:58 PM (GMT) on 16 October, 2006

Nice. I really like this.

comment by Sarah at 02:45 PM (GMT) on 16 October, 2006

you say it's not perfect but it looks quite beautiful without having seen all your other shots!
love the fluidity and softness of the lines.

comment by Lynn at 03:50 PM (GMT) on 16 October, 2006

This is my favourite of the "movement of light" shots. It's so organic, reminds me of an Art Noveau styled flower, or an instrument like a trumpet. It's free flowing yet in stasis. Wonderful.

comment by Carrie at 04:04 AM (GMT) on 19 October, 2006

This one is much better than the other ones you recently posted...I love the colours, and this actually looks like a smoke shot, whereas the others are way too processed for my taste.

While you're totally free to do whatever you want on your site, I think as far as doing a tutorial for this, or giving guidance, you might want to let people know that what they're seeing here isn't even remotely what they'll get unless they very heavily process. Just makes me sad that some people might think they failed at the process of experimenting with smoke, when they likely didn't.

comment by Yulia at 10:14 AM (GMT) on 19 October, 2006

this is really beautiful!!! I loved the earlier smoke shots that you did some months ago and was wondering if you would post any more. This really reminds me of blown glass - so fluid and moldable.

comment by ella at 01:51 PM (GMT) on 11 August, 2007

perfection just got a form.