<<< o >>>untitled #0039 44 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

It's been about three weeks since I put up any shots of the kids, so here's one of Harmony. I'll try and get some of the others during the week.

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
3.11pm on 29/10/06
Canon 20D
EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM
105mm (168mm equiv.)
f/5.6
1/60
manual
n/a
evaluative
100
580EX
RAW
C1 Pro
1x1
 
1x1 + children [portraits]
comment by Graham at 09:00 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

Whow David, this one is a great shot in many ways.

I like the high key effect that you have processed and the charm of Harmony is very striking also. It's very diffuse lighting from your 580ex flash, no sign of any catchlight though which was always the signature of master portrait photographers. How did you achieve this - do you have a flash diffuser or bounced it off a reflector?
Well done, I'm sure Libby must be pleased with this one.

comment by Karl Baumann at 09:04 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

sweet :) love the DOF and the soft tone of this one

comment by nferreira at 09:52 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

This portrait is full of little details. Beautifully mastered!

David, just a little apart... the name of Harmony is not correct in your comment. :-)

comment by Alexandru Savu at 09:56 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

Love it.

comment by djn1 at 10:05 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

Graham: thanks. As for the lighting, it was bounced off the ceiling but I left the diffuser attached to the flash, so most of the light was bounced but a portion of it was more direct.

nferreira: thanks, and well spotted :-)

comment by Mark at 10:13 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

I don't know...there's something about her eyes that just don't look quite right to me. Almost as if they didn't catch enough light so you've had to rescue them somewhat but in doing so they've stood out for the wrong reasons....or you've knocked something out....something.

comment by skenz at 10:44 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

I can't believe in this one! It's simply perfect.

comment by Ben at 11:01 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

Very nice :) The high key effect works great, and her pose is just adorable.

comment by jennifer at 11:02 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

Reminds me of an antique doll - with the spooky glass eyes and serene expression Very lovely though, would love a blow by blow 'how to' on this!

comment by Ries at 11:32 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

Beautiful!!! That look in her eyes... lovely shot!

comment by Jeppe at 11:34 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

Wow. This could be gorgeous. Such a wonderful expression. And a pretty little girl.


However, she rather looks like a doll or a CG invention and not a person with all that USM and skin processing.

comment by Arthur at 11:51 PM (GMT) on 29 October, 2006

Hmm. I really don’t like this one, I’m afraid. I suppose because it’s the sort of shot I hope I never take: a pretty flat, posed, studio-style portrait, that lacks a spark of intrigue or suggestiveness.

Those truly dreadful things said (even more so of someone who’s work I admire, and who’s been very helpful and inspiriational), there is technical excellence: perfect DOF, and exquisite toning.

The bar has been set so high with the likes of Rho and Mia, Don’t look up #2, and When we were young that even a photo anyone should be proud to have taken can seem ordinary by comparison...

:-)

comment by djn1 at 12:10 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Mark: I've toned down here eyes a little.

Jennife: yes, she can be a bit doll-like :-) As for how this was done: the background layer was duplicated and gaussian-blurred (by 15px). The blend mode for this layer was then set to overlay and the opacity knocked back to around 60%. The black and white conversion was done using the channel mixer to extract the red channel and the overall contrast for the image was adjusted using a Curve. Her eyes were lightened using a second masked curve.

Jeppe: I've used different settings in 'smart sharpen' for this one so it's interesting to hear that you think it detracts from the image. As for the skin processing: the technique I described above is one that I've used quite often, but I take your point.

Arthur: this works for me because this is one of Harmony's typical expressions: a kind of dreamy but contented 'elsewhere' look, and it wasn't posed. She knew I was taking photographs, but at this point she was watching TV while sat on a settee. Again though, I take your point about it looking like a typical portrait shot. I still like it though ;-)

comment by Jelb at 12:28 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Bonjour,
A great technical shot.. Thank for the lesson !
Your url is on my new blog..Do you agree!?

comment by Alec Long [Shutter And Pupil] at 03:42 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

I agree with some of the comments above. The USM is pretty aggressive, to the point of distraction in her hair and eyelashes. One of my favorite techniques to keep it from getting too hyper-real is to duplicate the main layer BEFORE applying USM, then apply as necessary, and use the eraser set to a medium opacity to erase away all the overzealous bits.

Otherwise its a lovely portrait.

comment by John Zeweniuk at 05:19 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

I love your portraits... among the best

comment by YETi at 05:33 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

what's wrong with a typical portrait shot? NOWT! I really like this.

comment by braesikalla at 06:33 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

High key rules!

comment by sarah at 07:02 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

are her eyelashes really that perfect, or is that the result of your post processing?

comment by Marius Muscalu at 08:00 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

nice portrait !

comment by {-P-} at 08:29 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Nice one !

comment by Arthur at 08:37 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Thanks, DJN: I know just what you mean.

I took a portrait of a friend’s daughter a little while ago, and processed it in a similar high-key way. Her parents were stunned and touched by her ‘fragile’, ‘reflective’, and ‘introverted’ expression.

She was watching Tractor Ted......

:-)

comment by Simon Goodchild at 09:21 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

How did you get such a clean background when she was sat on a sofa? Please include this sort of stuff in your tutorials!

comment by Quenton at 09:38 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Quel magnifique petit ange!
La photo est magnifique, vriament!

comment by dacian at 10:10 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

beautiful expression and details!
did you use photoshop on the hair or erase the background? it's so clean, as if it were shot in a studio. and "doll face" is one of my favorites, thanks for reminding me of it :)

comment by Rick M. at 10:45 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

DJN,
It would be interesting to see the 'raw' image that was your starting point for this portrait, just to see how much work got done for the transformation

comment by m at 11:32 AM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Hooray. Welcome back from decrepit Blackpool.
NIce pic today :-)

comment by Psychodudu at 12:31 PM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Ohhh goodness me, she's absolutely GORGEOUS! Images like this make my heart melt, David. You don't need to be a talented guy to get something out of this, she's doing all the work for you! Soft textures and wonderful lighting, this is an absolute cracker.

comment by miklos at 02:49 PM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

I usually always fade USM (Edit > Fade Unsharp Mask) directly after I apply it to tone it down a bit, with the Mode set to Luminosity..

comment by Joe at 02:59 PM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

This is a very good shot, the girl is cute and the lighting is very nice. The DOF is wonderful as well. Can't say enough about this shot. The sense of emotion is what really makes the difference for me!

comment by Craig at 03:16 PM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Excellent work David, soft tones and focus are perfect!

comment by John at 08:07 PM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Beautiful portrait, very fine light.
//John

comment by djn1 at 08:27 PM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Thanks everyone.
Alec: yep, I do something similar but in this instance decided to leave it a bit sharper than usual.

sarah: she has nice eyelashes but I suspect the USM enhances them a bit.

Arthur: yes, kids expressions when watching televsion are quite fascinating.

Simon: will do.

Rick: I'll be doing a tuturial on high-key portraits at some point soon so will include some unedited versions when I do.

comment by Geoff at 09:10 PM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

Really nice shot Dave. Technically fantastic. I was not sold on the expression until you wrote what she was doing. At first glance it looks posed and a little forced, but now you say it, I can see the far away look.

comment by chiara at 10:03 PM (GMT) on 30 October, 2006

I love you portraits. Especially the ones of your kids.

comment by jesse at 09:03 AM (GMT) on 31 October, 2006

its cool to watch your kids grow up. fantastic shot.

comment by Ronnie at 11:37 AM (GMT) on 31 October, 2006

ooh, thats a dreamy beauty!
Very nice!
Love the B&W tones!

comment by Ronnie at 11:38 AM (GMT) on 31 October, 2006

Forgot,...
You use a studio lights setup??

comment by Fotographix! at 02:51 PM (GMT) on 31 October, 2006

Nice depth of feild. light is so soft, which is very nice to a child.
Bravo!

comment by Adriana at 07:54 PM (GMT) on 31 October, 2006

NO doubht we all are getting old. or your kids are growing incredibly fast. Love the use of ligth. What was your source?

comment by djn1 at 08:31 PM (GMT) on 31 October, 2006

Ronnie and Adriana: I used my 580EX speedlite, bounced off the ceiling. And yes, they're growing up fast.

comment by navin harish at 08:32 AM (GMT) on 1 November, 2006

Very nice potrait

comment by Mary at 03:03 PM (GMT) on 1 November, 2006

Beautiful pic. The lighting is nice; enhances her facial features. I also like the detail in her hair. Your pics of your children amaze me.

comment by Alex at 08:01 PM (GMT) on 19 January, 2007

Amazing...