<<< o >>>dear liza 35 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

This is the first of two beachcoming shots, and as usual I can't decide which I prefer. This one is probably the best photograph of the two, but tomorrow's is a bit more surreal and dramatic. I'll let you decide :-)

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
10.33am on 14/1/07
Canon 20D
EF 17-40 f/4L USM
20mm (32mm equiv.)
f/4.0
1/640
aperture priority
-1/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
minor rotation
 
3x2 + beachcombing + fylde coast
comment by John at 11:21 PM (GMT) on 14 January, 2007

I like how your recent photos have captured the grayness of the season.

comment by Gavin at 11:34 PM (GMT) on 14 January, 2007

I think this is definitely one of my favourite's of yours. The best I've seen. Superb! The colour and light is just beautiful.

comment by Steve at 11:42 PM (GMT) on 14 January, 2007

Stunning! It's amazing how beautiful you've made such a mundane scene appear. The soft lines in this are great, and the DOF is great as well.

comment by EssPea | Photography at 12:07 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Great tones, and the DOF looks great, although I suspect it has been enhance in PS

comment by Richard at 12:12 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Great shot David. If there is one thing I would ask you to teach me, it would be how to deal with sand in RAW and PS. I realy struggle with it. Nice lighting on this too

comment by nferreira at 12:13 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Love the selective focus on the sand. The composition is without a doubt very Chromasia style. Can't wait to see tomorrow's shot.

comment by Justin at 12:16 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

love it - great subject

comment by [ PIXEL VIKING ] at 01:07 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

With all the litter on that beach, it's amazing how clean the sand is :) I like the green colours in the sky. Can't wait for your tutorials to start. I feel like I've been waiting forever by now :)

comment by dave at 01:43 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

there's an almost hyper-real feel to this image: pixar-realism, maybe. real, but not quite realistic!? is that what you're trying to achieve, dave?
if so, well done...

comment by Sean at 03:20 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

I can describe how great I think this is - when it showed up on the screen my first thought was "WOW!!!"

comment by mikelangelo at 05:10 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

It's strange, you've managed to take a plastic bucket on the beach and make a very nice image of it. And the bucket's BROKEN, too boot! It looks as though you have a soft spotlight/flashlight above and to the left of the bucket. Also, the depth of field is really nice. Really makes the subject pop nicely. The sand makes this image. Neat.

comment by Alexandru at 06:02 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Very nice colors. The depth of field is just great. Your shots are an inspiration to me

comment by Richard Trim at 07:09 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Great contrast between the traditional almost natural beach and the legacy of 'selfish man'. Powerful DOF influence. Pixel Viking has made the obvious observation about the sand looking clean. Superficially it is ... but the microscopic pollutants and minute plastic particles would surprise most people.

comment by P.J. at 07:14 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

This one is pretty nice. I'll look forward to tomorrows shot, too.

comment by riesenriel at 08:14 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

What a beautiful composition... the tones and DOF are just great!

comment by Jennifer at 08:29 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Amazing - how can a nasty bit of rusbish make a shot that is s lovely. Verity reckons the groyne look like Gt Wall of China!

comment by {-P-} at 08:33 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

The sand texture is superbe. Great composition

comment by Thomas Solberg / Project neXus at 09:27 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

I like the lighting in this one. There is something I can't put my finger on... it's like it seems like a CGI :-)

comment by Marek Nierychlo // lichtlauschen at 10:25 AM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Great lightning and depth of field, but I think, that the tone is that one which really works on this image. Its so surrealistic.

comment by Raphaƫl at 12:11 PM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Wawou ! When i saw this picture, i've juste said "Wawou". I really love your photo ! Amazing !

comment by San Sebastian at 12:56 PM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Nice image, great light !

comment by Ash at 01:02 PM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

You know, I really seem to be in the minority here, but the shot doesn't do it for me. As much as I appreciate the surrealism and artistic merit of much of your other work, this feels a little too fake to me. The bucket seems like it's artificially added in rather than being a natural element of the scene.
Sorry David, hopefully tomorrow's will do it for me instead!

comment by Jamey at 02:00 PM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

I like the photo but I'm gonna be geeky and praise you on the processing here. the thing is that I know this has been masked so my eyes went into overdrive looking for tell-tale haloes to catch you out with but I can't find any. It's infuriatingly precise. Well done.

comment by Christian Wiedel at 03:35 PM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

great! i love how you postprocess these beachcombing shots! something for your tutorial section when that happens imo.

comment by Roded at 06:23 PM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Absolutely gorgeous image! the simple geometry and the sharp details are great.

comment by djn1 at 06:36 PM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Thanks all.

EssPea: no, the DoF is natural.

Richard: generally, one of the things you need to do with sand, especially if you increase the contrast more than a minimal amount, is to reduce the saturation. For this one, and tomorrow's, I toned down the saturation quite substantially.

PIXEL VIKING: yep, it does seem a long time since we first mentioned the tutorials, and it will be a while yet. All being well (though don't hold me to this) we should have something available by the end of February.

dave: yes, the 'not quite real' look is something that I quite like.

mikelangelo: given the right light, nearly anything can be made to look good.

Ash: one of the reasons the shot doesn't look quite real is that it was blowing a gale; i.e. the sand is uniformly distributed around the bucket with none of the usual footprints, other bits of rubbish, and so on.

Jamey: my rule for masking, at least these days, is that if the end result is visible in any way then I need to do it again ;-)

comment by Jeff Ambrose at 07:10 PM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

Strange lighting I could've sworn a flash would've been fired to underexpose the background like thta but your data doesn't show it. Nice masking.

comment by thomas mueller at 07:25 PM (GMT) on 15 January, 2007

like it very much, because of the surreal feeling. great processing!

comment by Greg Bobbin at 12:57 AM (GMT) on 16 January, 2007

I thought it was another shipwreck!

comment by John at 01:26 PM (GMT) on 16 January, 2007

Constructively speaking, it looks over-worked to me and artifical, almost "table top photography" like. Excellent processing though if that's the look you were trying to achieve.

comment by Pam R at 04:47 PM (GMT) on 16 January, 2007

Fantastic! One of my all-time Chromasia favorites. The coloring and gorgeously smooth tonal gradations make this shot outstanding.

comment by The Plankmeister at 08:35 PM (GMT) on 16 January, 2007

This looks like an HDR image... The atmosphere created is surreal... like the light is almost too tangible... Magic shot :)

comment by jeronimo freymann at 04:21 AM (GMT) on 6 November, 2007

wow exelent

comment by Liza at 04:37 AM (GMT) on 30 November, 2007

The name caught my attention, to be honest... but mine is pronounced "Lee-zah" not.. "Lie-zah"... Although that is how it's spelled.

comment by singapore architecture photographers at 04:40 AM (GMT) on 4 January, 2011

The shape of the broken bucket just adds wonder to the picture.