<<< o >>>Fiona #2 28 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

This is the second shot of Fiona that I mentioned yesterday, the one that Libby thinks is much better than yesterday's effort ... I remain unconvinced ;-)

Oh, and I do have another couple of shots of Fiona that I may put up, both of which are more akin to yesterday's than today's.

captured
camera
lens
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
5.55pm on 21/8/07
Canon 5D
EF 35mm f/1.4L USM
f/1.4
1/6400
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
1x1
 
travel [Nassau, the Bahamas] + people [portraiture] + commissions + no print
comment by macroni at 07:02 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

I'm with you David. I like yesterday's picture just that bit more! Today's one isn't too bad either ;-)

comment by Kevin at 08:07 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

IMO, the depth of field is too distracting. My eye can't find anything to rest on.

comment by E y e V i s i o n at 08:35 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

I agree with Libby. Maybe the dof is a bit too shallow, at least the closer part of the sunglass should be sharp.

comment by Jennifer at 09:54 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

Very cool, but I'd prefer just a little more DOF too - trouble is when you have fast glass you just wanna play!

comment by Joseph at 10:22 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

that 1.4 is amazing david! I love this!!

best one out of the series so far IMO.

looks amazing on white background too

comment by Markus at 10:31 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

I like the DOF, got my fingers itching to get one of those 1.4 lenses...

comment by m at 10:32 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

I too prefer this one. It doesn't matter why it's subjective. ;-)

comment by Ryan at 10:33 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

I like it. Would be a great DKNY magazine ad.

comment by vasa at 10:46 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

wht kinda lighting did u use here..its absolutely fantastic

comment by ttomasso at 11:27 PM (GMT) on 10 September, 2007

I like the DOF here, however to some people might be too blurred. As abstract shot it could do well.

comment by Rob at 12:04 AM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

I like this, but I'm not sure there is enough of a focal point here to work exceptionally well. I like narrow DOF images so that is not what is bothering me - I think the sunglasses play too prominent a role here. I liked yesterdays, except for the eye treatment.

comment by Keith De-Lin at 03:22 AM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

very cool shot.

comment by Richard H at 04:33 AM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

Now that's some shallow DOF. I really like this shot. It's funny how there's a lot of fuzzy out of focus detail that captures a lot of your attention.
Well captured in your typical amazing style.

comment by TinaR at 07:40 AM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

Mh, can't say which one is better, cause these are two complete different pictures.
But I like this one very much too.
Great tones!

comment by Josef Renklint at 09:03 AM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

I definitely prefer the one from yesterday, it has a glow to it that is lacking in this shot. Good job anyway.

comment by mooch at 01:09 PM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

Yesterdays was more classic. This for me lacks depth of field but typically looks good in the thumbnail.

comment by Ash at 02:07 PM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

You know, I do think the DOF is too shallow, and while her hair is (slightly) in focus it's not clear enough to be a good focal point. I actually like the tiny thumbnail at the top of this comments box more than the large photo itself. A slightly deeper DOF may have made a difference.

comment by Frank at 03:29 PM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

I agree with eyevision, who agrees with Libby. I likke yesterday's picture but prefer today's.

comment by olivier [CoolPixels] at 04:02 PM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

Very beautyful composition... great render and treatment !

comment by Sean McCormick at 05:01 PM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

Very interesting use of selective focus. I like how it breaks conventional rules of photography (i.e. focus on the eyes or suffer a terrible death). This image proves to me that some rules should be broken.

comment by Jamey at 05:21 PM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

Like this a lot.

comment by djn1 at 07:06 PM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

Thanks all. As for the DoF: I can see why some of you think it should be deeper, but I don't think it would have worked quite so well that way.

comment by Ronald at 09:22 PM (GMT) on 11 September, 2007

Definetly in your camp Dave!
Libby is in the wrong corner this time;-)

comment by Alice at 02:34 PM (GMT) on 12 September, 2007

I agree with Libby. I think this is an awesome shot. I really like the DOF and the b/w. Very nicely done.

comment by stijn at 11:10 AM (GMT) on 13 September, 2007

this si beautiful ... the focus is special great one man really stunning

comment by milou at 04:43 PM (GMT) on 13 September, 2007

Art-tastic.

comment by Reza at 06:13 PM (GMT) on 14 September, 2007

I like this one, it's amazing shot.

comment by Philippe Roy at 02:34 AM (GMT) on 12 October, 2007

I'll have to side with Libby on this one... though I like the series you did with Fiona, I really like this totally different take on a portrait. Probably not what the tourism board is looking for, granted, but really appealing to (my) eye.