<<< o >>>dear liza #3 19 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

I can't decide whether I prefer this one to the original dear liza, or dear liza #2, but I am pleased with it, mainly because I managed to bring out the detail in the bucket without the processing being too obvious. As you can see, there's quite a large difference between this version and the original:

.../iblog/archives/dear_liza_3.php

As for the processing: five masked Curves for contrast, one unmasked one to tone the image, and a Selective Color layer to add a bit of yellow to the highlights.

As always, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
12.38pm on 31/11/07
Canon 1Ds Mark II
EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
16mm
f/3.5
1/250
aperture priority
-1/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
2x1
 
2x1 + fylde coast [scenic] + beachcombing
comment by Tom K. at 08:37 PM (GMT) on 1 December, 2007

Simple...and....wonderful.

comment by nuno ferreira at 09:29 PM (GMT) on 1 December, 2007

And the result couldn't be better. This is my favorite of the three and a come back to the original Chromasia style that I know the first time I visited your photoblog, a few years ago.

comment by mal at 10:01 PM (GMT) on 1 December, 2007

Gosh! This one suck you right into the image Dave, beautiful. mal

comment by Kevin Crafts at 02:32 AM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

Your processing has made this a great photo - nice work.

comment by doreen at 05:41 AM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

i'm so glad that you've started to provide the originals of your photos in every entry. i love being able to compare them with the final results and marveling your post-processing skills XD

if you don't mind my asking, why is this series of photos called "dear liza"?

comment by Rob at 06:09 AM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

Thanks for the view of the original. Nice work.

comment by Michael George at 07:27 AM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

I must agree with doreen, I am in love with your posting of the originals because it makes my visits even more inspiring. Your post-processing skills are amazing! Your images give me such a good feeling, I've just always loved the tones you use. They've given you a great style.

Anyway, critiques.

I really like how the yellow pops although I think a lot more can be done with your processing techniques. For example, if you just look closely at where the bottom of the cup meets the sand, I wouldn't suggest a crop but just a closer shot with the same processing would make for a very abstract image. With your editing technique the use of a mock tilt-shift lens blur could also be awesome with objects you find on the beach.

I don't know, that's more of an idea than a critique but I'm just trying to imagine the range of your possibilities!

Although, I do have one question. I'm finally working to purchase my first L lens, and I was wondering if you might suggest what would make for a best "first buy." I'm leaning towards the 24-70 f/2.8 L USM because that seems to be the most versatile-- one I might use most often.

Being a student I do a wide range of subjects from landscapes and documentary of buildings and places, to portraits both studio and environmental.

Obviously every photographer is different but if you could maybe tell me the one lens you would keep if you had to get rid of all the others, that would be great!

comment by barfly at 10:28 AM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

great one, simple but efficient

comment by Mohamadreza at 10:35 AM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

Great shot, stunning light, well done.

comment by El Jefe at 12:11 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

Is a good idea post the original and the final picture. Is like " magic "

comment by djn1 at 03:38 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

Thanks everyone.

doreen: the title comes from a song/nursery rhyme which starts with the phrase " There's a hole in the bucket, dear Liza, dear Liza". Years ago, I decided to title all my images, and I often wish I hadn't as it can take as long to come up with a title as it does to post-process them. What it often means is that some of my titles can be a bit obscure :-)

Michael: I did try a closer shot, but much preferred this one when I came to edit them. As for your question about which lens to buy: the 24-70 is probably the one I'd keep if I had to get rid of all the rest of my lenses. It's really sharp, and it has a useful range. That said, if you're using a camera with a 1.6 crop you would probably be better off with the EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM. I haven't used one, but have heard good reports.

comment by Osiriums Ventaka at 04:45 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

Nice one! Great colors! I like in particular the contrast with yello and background!

comment by Simon C at 05:40 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

The mix of colours and textures works particularly well.

comment by Jamey at 08:36 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2007

Very nice, I like these shots.

comment by Alice at 12:44 AM (GMT) on 4 December, 2007

Fantastic! Quite a difference btw the before and after. I really like the processing you did. It seems so subtle overall, yet when comparing it to the original, it's such a big difference. But still looks very natural. As always, you do great work.

comment by Navin Harish at 09:22 AM (GMT) on 4 December, 2007

Great shot. Very good details

comment by Jylan Wynne at 07:10 AM (GMT) on 5 December, 2007

Great photos, like the effect of the sand only being in focus around the bottom of the bucket.

comment by ciprian at 09:44 AM (GMT) on 5 December, 2007

nice dof, but i'm wondering if the sandal is in close proximity to this bucket? is that a snail on the right in the sand?

comment by andré at 10:55 PM (GMT) on 2 January, 2008

Great use of reduced dof! Like it!