As I mentioned yesterday, I've been using Photomatix Pro to generate pseudo-HDR images from a single RAW file, and of all my recent attempts I think that this is probably my favourite, and I may well include it in next month's tutorial.
If you take a look at the original you will see that it might just have been possible to create much the same effect using a variety of masked Curves, but the HDR process makes it a lot easier.
The original image (processed using the default settings in ACR) is here:
Oh, and let me know what you think about the boot in the top-right corner of the image. I did think about cloning it out, but thought it added another dimension to the story.
captured camera lens focal length aperture shutter speed shooting mode exposure bias metering mode ISO flash image quality RAW converter cropped?
2.41pm on 11/8/06
Canon 20D
EF 17-40 f/4L USM
17mm (27mm equiv.)
f/8.0
1/250
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
420EX (-2/3 FEC)
RAW
C1 Pro
minor
comment byJennifer at 09:35 PM (GMT) on 12 April, 2008
Dig those green Docs! I like the boot left in - tells you they are looking at someone but keeps you guessing as to the identity - could be a mate or the police!
comment byAndre at 09:36 PM (GMT) on 12 April, 2008
I love pseudo-HDR, especially when the sky is overcast and contrast is nowhere to be found. Most recently I used it to spruce up images of the ruins of the Quebec city armoury the day after it was gutted by a fire.
comment bynikohk at 09:49 PM (GMT) on 12 April, 2008
Very cool this HDR. Punk is not dead. :p
comment bycsj@id7.co.uk at 10:08 PM (GMT) on 12 April, 2008
It looks powerful, in both subject and colour, like spray art. It works well, the boot holds the story complete, with where there attention might be. Technique holds its own here compared to the original. It gets the thumbs up down here in the South.
comment by Ina at 11:44 PM (GMT) on 12 April, 2008
Sorry, but for me, this is a tad overprocessed... Looking forward to the next tutorial, though!
comment byJohn at 11:59 PM (GMT) on 12 April, 2008
I didn't really care for what I call first generation HDRs, but I've seen some really nice HDRs lately. This one is very well done. Bravo!
comment byXavier Rey at 12:12 AM (GMT) on 13 April, 2008
Punk is not dead !!! Great !!
comment bymikelangelo at 02:03 AM (GMT) on 13 April, 2008
I like this. however, the extreme detail and contrast really ages the people, I think. It makes them look much "dirtier" and 'leathery' ... especially on the lady's arm and face.
Nothing wrong with it.. just an interesting way to interpret the subjects.
comment byRobb McAulay at 02:12 AM (GMT) on 13 April, 2008
Maybe it's my recent switch to film talking but I too feel that this is a little over processed. While I appreciate the HDR process and notice that it is only a natural extension of using ND grads etc I think that using it to such an extent as this takes the textures right out of context and leaves the viewer in a state of confusion. Although technically it gives the image great depth I think it leaves our brain no option but to try and flatten it (that may sound like nonsense)
Also, d'you think he knows that skol is only 2.8% ROCK n' ROLL! :D
I like this effect and I've found that I often get more pleasing results myself with the single-frame technique in Photomatix than with multiple exposures combined in either PM or Photoshop - that's not to say that multiple exposures aren't preferable in certain situations, just that I haven't got it quite right yet!
There's some very interesting examples of HDR in the latest issue of Ag magazine, plus an article on the technique that's a good read.
Leaving the boot in was the right decision.
comment byzeppelin at 06:20 PM (GMT) on 13 April, 2008
I agree the boot left in is better... you can see then that they are talking with someone. I would really like to see the original for comparison though.
comment byLightseeker at 09:55 PM (GMT) on 13 April, 2008
The HDR treatment really suits the subject and there's no comparison with the original processing!
I haven't commented in a while- but I really like this shot. And normally I dislike the post processing to this extent, but it suits the subject matter. And I wish I knew how to get spikes like his!
comment byRobert at 02:59 AM (GMT) on 14 April, 2008
Boot in is good, but it needs more of the boot (nnot sure how much, if any, is cropped out). As it is, it seems like an accident.
As far as being overprocessed, that's fits punk. Push the boundary, then push some more.
comment by doreen at 05:50 AM (GMT) on 14 April, 2008
my eyes start to water if i stare at this image for too long ... XD
comment byjano lavalle at 06:36 AM (GMT) on 14 April, 2008
the cans!
comment byJasper at 10:14 AM (GMT) on 14 April, 2008
Hmm, I'm not too fond of this HDR conversion. A little bit over-processed I think. But I like the composition and angle!
comment bymooch at 03:39 PM (GMT) on 14 April, 2008
Although it does tend to make the paving overly busy I really do like the processing. Far more intersting texture/pattern to those slabs than in the original. Very vibrant colours too. How much is photomatix?
comment by li at 05:01 PM (GMT) on 14 April, 2008
I find the color too strong for the eye, not quite pleasant to view. I wonder how long does that guy have to spend on his hair everyday, or maybe he sleeps in sitting position?
comment byChris at 06:21 PM (GMT) on 14 April, 2008
This is really outstanding work David. Congratulations and I look forward to your next tutorial!
comment bydjn1 at 07:38 PM (GMT) on 14 April, 2008
Thanks all.
comment byCarlos Lorenzo at 04:18 PM (GMT) on 15 April, 2008
As if the subject was not good enough you go and use the perfect angle. Great shot.
comment byRodrigo Gómez at 03:36 AM (GMT) on 16 April, 2008
I like a lot the image, but I do find the boot somewhat a distraction. The subjects are interesting enough and the boot just keeps attracting my eyes ;-)
Can't wait to see next month tutorial!
comment by Saito at 05:38 PM (GMT) on 17 April, 2008
I really like this shot. Normally, I shy away from the HDR pictures, but this one needed to be dramatic and bold to really tell the story. I love it, from the boots to his hair, this one needed to be loud.
comment byBenny at 05:00 AM (GMT) on 18 April, 2008
Interesting tones. The clothing almost looks like chrome. I like the effect--really makes the subjects >POP< out of the screen.
comment byJide Alakija at 04:15 PM (GMT) on 19 May, 2008
I'm not sure about this one...somehow for me it's a tad bit over processed. Sorry Dave this isn't working for me.
I must say it is making a statment ;) but not sure it's a positive one!
As I mentioned yesterday, I've been using Photomatix Pro to generate pseudo-HDR images from a single RAW file, and of all my recent attempts I think that this is probably my favourite, and I may well include it in next month's tutorial.
If you take a look at the original you will see that it might just have been possible to create much the same effect using a variety of masked Curves, but the HDR process makes it a lot easier.
The original image (processed using the default settings in ACR) is here:
.../archives/making_a_statement.php
Oh, and let me know what you think about the boot in the top-right corner of the image. I did think about cloning it out, but thought it added another dimension to the story.
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
Canon 20D
EF 17-40 f/4L USM
17mm (27mm equiv.)
f/8.0
1/250
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
420EX (-2/3 FEC)
RAW
C1 Pro
minor
Dig those green Docs! I like the boot left in - tells you they are looking at someone but keeps you guessing as to the identity - could be a mate or the police!
I love pseudo-HDR, especially when the sky is overcast and contrast is nowhere to be found. Most recently I used it to spruce up images of the ruins of the Quebec city armoury the day after it was gutted by a fire.
Very cool this HDR. Punk is not dead. :p
It looks powerful, in both subject and colour, like spray art. It works well, the boot holds the story complete, with where there attention might be. Technique holds its own here compared to the original. It gets the thumbs up down here in the South.
Sorry, but for me, this is a tad overprocessed... Looking forward to the next tutorial, though!
I didn't really care for what I call first generation HDRs, but I've seen some really nice HDRs lately. This one is very well done. Bravo!
Punk is not dead !!! Great !!
I like this. however, the extreme detail and contrast really ages the people, I think. It makes them look much "dirtier" and 'leathery' ... especially on the lady's arm and face.
Nothing wrong with it.. just an interesting way to interpret the subjects.
Maybe it's my recent switch to film talking but I too feel that this is a little over processed. While I appreciate the HDR process and notice that it is only a natural extension of using ND grads etc I think that using it to such an extent as this takes the textures right out of context and leaves the viewer in a state of confusion. Although technically it gives the image great depth I think it leaves our brain no option but to try and flatten it (that may sound like nonsense)
Also, d'you think he knows that skol is only 2.8% ROCK n' ROLL! :D
I like the way you use the "pseudo-HDR" effect. I think the perspective (angle) and the composition work well too! Do you ever take bad shots?
P.S. I think the boot in the top, right corner adds something unexpected to the image: almost a continuation of a story.
Their punk style appearance goes with the HDR process. Their wild appearance is different so why not the photo too.
I like this effect and I've found that I often get more pleasing results myself with the single-frame technique in Photomatix than with multiple exposures combined in either PM or Photoshop - that's not to say that multiple exposures aren't preferable in certain situations, just that I haven't got it quite right yet!
There's some very interesting examples of HDR in the latest issue of Ag magazine, plus an article on the technique that's a good read.
Leaving the boot in was the right decision.
superbe!! bravo !
I agree the boot left in is better... you can see then that they are talking with someone. I would really like to see the original for comparison though.
The HDR treatment really suits the subject and there's no comparison with the original processing!
I haven't commented in a while- but I really like this shot. And normally I dislike the post processing to this extent, but it suits the subject matter. And I wish I knew how to get spikes like his!
Boot in is good, but it needs more of the boot (nnot sure how much, if any, is cropped out). As it is, it seems like an accident.
As far as being overprocessed, that's fits punk. Push the boundary, then push some more.
my eyes start to water if i stare at this image for too long ... XD
the cans!
Hmm, I'm not too fond of this HDR conversion. A little bit over-processed I think. But I like the composition and angle!
Although it does tend to make the paving overly busy I really do like the processing. Far more intersting texture/pattern to those slabs than in the original. Very vibrant colours too. How much is photomatix?
I find the color too strong for the eye, not quite pleasant to view. I wonder how long does that guy have to spend on his hair everyday, or maybe he sleeps in sitting position?
This is really outstanding work David. Congratulations and I look forward to your next tutorial!
Thanks all.
As if the subject was not good enough you go and use the perfect angle. Great shot.
I like a lot the image, but I do find the boot somewhat a distraction. The subjects are interesting enough and the boot just keeps attracting my eyes ;-)
Can't wait to see next month tutorial!
I really like this shot. Normally, I shy away from the HDR pictures, but this one needed to be dramatic and bold to really tell the story. I love it, from the boots to his hair, this one needed to be loud.
Interesting tones. The clothing almost looks like chrome. I like the effect--really makes the subjects >POP< out of the screen.
I'm not sure about this one...somehow for me it's a tad bit over processed. Sorry Dave this isn't working for me.
I must say it is making a statment ;) but not sure it's a positive one!