<<< o >>>re-animator 33 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

Here's another Lensbaby shot, a rather surreal interpretation of one of the buildings on Fleetwood seafront. I'm not entirely happy with this one (though would struggle to articulate why) but it has given me some ideas for other shots that I think would work better – so in that sense it's at least partially successful :)

On a totally different matter ...

A while ago I was approached by Josh Furey from Nocture Records who wanted to use one of my images as a cover for his forthcoming album – Archaeology. He also sent me a link to a couple of tracks from the album, which I really liked, so I sent him an email letting him know our usual cost for an album cover. He got back to me saying it was out of budget. I replied saying I'd be happy to negotiate. And then I didn't hear from him until last week.

He got back to me to tell me that he'd finished the album using his own artwork and that as I'd liked the preview tracks I might like to download the finished album. I haven't stopped listening to it since, and have included a link to one of the 'darker' tracks below.

Anyway, my reason for mentioning all this is a) because I think at least some of you will probably enjoy the album, and b) because 'against the flow' is now the cover image. In itself, this isn't especially significant, but it did remind me that creative collaboration, in a project you believe in, is often considerably more rewarding than earning a few quid; i.e. while the latter puts food on the table, it doesn't always feed the soul.

And finally, if you're interested, Josh has posted a blog entry about why the image was significant to his project here.

On which note, I'm going to have a cup of coffee, put my feet up for five minutes, and listen to 'Pieces of Her': a much gentler song than the one I included here.

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
15.44pm on 13/2/09
Canon 1Ds Mark II
Lensbaby Composer (double glass optic)
60mm
f/8.0
1/50
Aperture Priority
+2/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
ACR
2x1
 
2x1 + urban
comment by Dan Kaufman at 05:01 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Okay, I'm convinced now: I just gotta a) win the Creative Point of View contest and win a Lensbaby, or b) eat peanut butter sandwiches for a month so I can save up to buy a Lensbaby.

I love what the depth-of-field hocus focus does to my brain's idea of what's going on. Another good un.

comment by Chris at 05:06 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Hi Dave,

This image works very well as a black and white image. The dark contrast helps bring out the details in areas such as the bricks and isolating the poles from the windows and entrance ways. However, for this shot, I am not keen about the level of blur and distortion on the left hand side, I think it is to much. Chris

comment by Mirko Herzner at 05:28 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

I am going to be honest with you: This image I do not like. In the beginning I thought it must be a wooden model of this building... Maybe I am simply missing a background... :-)

comment by Abhijit at 05:29 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Wow image!

comment by Ilan at 05:41 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Heh.. At first I thought it was a tilt-shift lens result, then I learned it was a Lensbaby.
Now I ask myself (and puzzled I haven't done it till now) - What's the difference between a TILT-SHIFT lens by definition and Lensbaby?

comment by djn1 at 05:51 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Dan: thanks, and good luck :)

Chris: I think the problem is that the sweet spot of focus should be more to the right, but I take your point.

Mirko: I do appreciate that this style of shot isn't to everyone's taste.

Ilan: a T/S lens shifts the plane of focus while the Lensbaby adds a sweet spot of focus, around which the rest of the image becomes progressively blurred. The two effects can looks quite similar though.

comment by Stephen DesRoches at 06:20 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

I feel surprised that I like the preview embedded track. Downloading the rest now.

comment by Briony at 07:01 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

This may be a dumb question but what is a lensbaby?

comment by djn1 at 07:16 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Briony: take a look at the Lensbaby website:

    http://www.lensbaby.com

comment by Thatch at 07:51 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Like this one, nice tones. I'll have to get out more and use my lensbaby ;) nice one.

comment by Gary Eddleston at 08:39 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

I have to agree with a privious comment, the blur on the left hand side for me is to much. Would it be possible to re-edit to match the right hand side and display?

Loverly angle on the building though.

comment by djn1 at 08:43 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Gary: in this case the blur is a consequence of the lens, not the post-production, so it can't really be changed. The amount of blur with a Lensbaby depends on the aperture - the bigger the aperture, the more blurred the shot - so the only way to get a less blurred version would be to reshoot using a smaller aperture.

comment by Robbie Veldwijk at 09:26 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Nice image and a nice effect!

comment by csj @ID7 at 09:32 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Mate, having NEVER used a lensbaby, or even had my hands on one, I dont know what to say =-) other than that I'm interested in seeing some more...... I like this shot, it feels very much like a model village, and the scale is meddling with my head.
All the more reason to have a bash at the competition to try and win that bad boy!....... csj

comment by Jennifer at 09:45 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Cool - yep it does look a little like a model but I like it.

comment by XaviH at 11:33 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Great and elegant!! I like the contrast between the blur in the peripheral and the definition and sharpness of the vertical columns.

comment by Carlos Garcia at 11:57 PM (GMT) on 18 February, 2009

Dave,

Fascinating image. It does appear to be a small model... something that a guy in a rubber Godzilla suit might step on at any moment. This is not to say that I don't appreciate the shot. The undecided architecture of the building adds to the skewed scale.

Carlos

comment by Mark at 12:50 AM (GMT) on 19 February, 2009

Pondering on your articulation of why you're not completely happy with it, Dave...Could it be that it's rather flat, as in 2 dimensional? I know people may jump at that and shout "but a photograph is 2 dimensional!" but you know what I mean....there's nothing in the image to convey any depth so it ends up looking like a blurred image with a bit masked out.

Just my initial thought on looking at it and reading your opening to the description. I don't think it's the left side either...I think it's the sky. There's something that doesn't quite hit the sweet spot isn't there....and I'm going with that 2D perception.

comment by Jonathan M Robson at 04:50 AM (GMT) on 19 February, 2009

Hi David,

I'm wondering how you know the aperture for the photo. The little aperture rings that I have for my lensbbay dont have any indication of the aperture written on them, I usually just guess, so I'm interested how you worked it out?

Cheers
Jonathan

comment by Brian Chen at 06:06 AM (GMT) on 19 February, 2009

This is a very interesting composition, especially with the lensbaby, the black and white and semi fake tilt shift give it a strange feeling. I like it a lot.

comment by lightseeker at 08:13 AM (GMT) on 19 February, 2009

Thanks for the link to the music! I like the 'toytown' look of images produced using the lensbaby and TS lenses.

comment by will pattison at 08:51 AM (GMT) on 19 February, 2009

i'm always fascinated by what you can do with a lensbaby or a tilt/shift, and this is no exception. i think it makes a not-so-interesting subject a lot more compelling!

wp.

comment by Camille Stein at 10:22 AM (GMT) on 19 February, 2009

fantástico trabajo

enhorabuena

... saludos...

comment by Adam Stevens at 05:35 PM (GMT) on 19 February, 2009

David-
Love the shot! very nice B&W as well. I thought TS when it first loaded but now I am convinced... 85 1.8 then the composer... my new wish list... I also enjoyed your side trip into artist collaboration. It strikes at a bit of what I think Mr. Hobby & Jarvis were hitting at a few weeks ago. Your example as well as the finished product for us to enjoy helped tie it all together... Well done. Now I am off to brew some coffee (come on tea? I live in Seattle!) and enjoy some of the album.

Cheers-
Adam

comment by David Chabashvili at 07:07 PM (GMT) on 19 February, 2009

Really nice work! Love the lens effect!

comment by Westy | P H O T O N O M Y at 07:15 PM (GMT) on 19 February, 2009

wow this is excellento... the blury edges are a great effect... and the harsh black contrast creates a really intertesting composition.. the sky is aslo really deep and moody... great work..

comment by Kristian at 06:33 AM (GMT) on 20 February, 2009

Great shot - It's true it does have some T/S qualities, the model building look too it. I definitely need to experiment some more with my own. Nice tones too :-)

comment by WAK-Design at 02:48 PM (GMT) on 20 February, 2009

Great frame, thanks for sharing!

comment by Ted Szukalski at 04:58 AM (GMT) on 21 February, 2009

I think the interesting aspect of this photograph is not so much the center focused lensbaby effect but a total lack of people in the scene. It makes it eerie.

comment by Alice at 08:41 PM (GMT) on 21 February, 2009

Beautiful shot. I'm normally not a big fan of Lensbaby shots, but this one is really nice. Good colors too.

comment by Rodrigo Campos at 02:05 PM (GMT) on 22 February, 2009

nice capture. congrats!

comment by Michael Ward at 04:36 AM (GMT) on 2 March, 2009

Ah! the Marine Hall Fleetwood, probably the only place in the world where the Beatles appeared and were booed at!
Nice shot its always nice to see the local land marks.

comment by Marco at 07:36 PM (GMT) on 9 March, 2009

What a wonderful surreal picture!