<<< o >>>untitled #98 10 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

What trip back to the UK would be complete without a shot of a washed-up something or other on Fleetwood beach :-) I'll also be posting another shot of this Pepsi can tomorrow: of Jason taking much the same photograph.

Jason's version of this shot is here:

http://www.escapism-online.com/blog-entry.php?pid=274

In other news: between now and the end of May you can subscribe to one of our Photoshop tutorials for free: either Portraits part one; an introduction to Lab Color mode; or Toning colour images. If you're interested, there's some further information at the top of the following page:

http://www.chromasia.com/tutorials/online/

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
plugins (etc)
cropped?
10.18am on 10/4/10
Canon 5D Mark II
EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
68mm
f/2.8
1/400
aperture priority
+2/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
ACR
Topaz Detail
minor
 
3x2 + beachcombing + show the original
comment by Navin Harish at 09:04 AM (GMT) on 10 May, 2010

Nice shot. Almost identical

comment by djn1 at 09:08 AM (GMT) on 10 May, 2010

Hi Navin. Yes, bar the difference in colour balance, they could almost be the same image. Great minds think alike ;-)

comment by Husac at 09:38 AM (GMT) on 10 May, 2010

Nice one, i like the narrow depth of field created. Good work!

comment by Tony at 10:01 AM (GMT) on 10 May, 2010

Amazing the limit of the depth of field. Spot on. I thought you'd done it on PS until I checked the "show original image"

Nice one.

comment by Dave Carrington at 10:27 PM (GMT) on 10 May, 2010

Good to see you back in your old stamping ground, Dave! :-)

comment by photo ex machina at 12:15 AM (GMT) on 11 May, 2010

Very evocative

comment by Chris at 03:46 AM (GMT) on 11 May, 2010

You cannot leave Fleetwood without taking a few shots of something washing up on the beach. It would not have been right :) Regarding the image, I like the DOF and enjoy the included shadow. I think the shadow provides some extra dimension to the image. I am surprised it is standing and in perfect condition. I would have suspected a can that is severely damaged either crushed or twisted.

comment by djn1 at 04:24 AM (GMT) on 11 May, 2010

Thanks everyone :)

comment by Jeremy at 11:22 AM (GMT) on 17 May, 2010

Dave: Is the DOF real? Just looking, it seems that the front of the can is in focus but the sand at the same distance is blurred. In any case, the sand goes from sharp to blurred very quickly ... there is about 1cm that is in focus. Just surprising that the DOF is so shallow at 2.8, is all ....

comment by djn1 at 11:49 AM (GMT) on 17 May, 2010

Jeremy: yes, the DoF is real, though bits of the can look slightly more focussed in the final version because of the sharpening.