<<< o >>>not quite there 12 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

I wish the guy from the previous shot hadn't got off at an earlier station, as I suspect his presence would have made this shot a little more interesting. Nonetheless, despite the absence of a face, haunting or otherwise, I still quite like this one.

Incidentally: if anyone's interested I put up the original of yesterday's shot here:

.../archives/between_destinations.php

camera
capture date
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
focal length
flash
image quality
white balance
cropped?
FujiFilm FinePix 40i
5.53pm on 14/9/04
f9.8
1/90
normal program
+0.0
pattern
200
8.7mm
no
JPEG/fine
auto
no
 
4x3
comment by Danielle at 11:56 PM (GMT) on 15 September, 2004

I like this picture. Probably mostly because of the clouds. I really like clouds. The only thing I don't like about it are the reflections of the lights from inside the train.......but otherwise it's very good.

comment by Camille Boulière at 12:20 AM (GMT) on 16 September, 2004

Shit! Why do i feel so small in front of you ?!

comment by Kris at 01:36 AM (GMT) on 16 September, 2004

God.
I love trains.

comment by andrea at 01:45 AM (GMT) on 16 September, 2004

I actually like the reflection in the clouds in the upper left corner~
Like a highway in the sky..
a

comment by Sandra Rocha at 02:59 AM (GMT) on 16 September, 2004

very moody shot, as if leaving and not arriving :-)
reminded me of daniel's (objective-view) shots of rails, same darkness arriving feel
~~

comment by Salamander at 09:24 AM (GMT) on 16 September, 2004

I have just discovered your site, and am really impressed with your photography. I am assuming that you are not a pro (just from your comments generally), but the quality of the photos shout 'serious professional' to me. You obviously have a great eye for details, colour, shapes - and with good retouching skills. Did you used to do wet-darkroom work befroe digital? Anyway, fine work and brilliant photoblog

comment by Cam at 12:12 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2004

David, im glad you chose to include a link to the original image from yesterday. Not only does it give insite into the technical methods used to achieve the end result, but more importantly (at least for me), it gives insight into the 'minds eye' of the photographer.

It is in the comparison that much can be learnt about one's photography. I sometimes find the changes more interesting than the final result. During the manipluation process, the conscious chooses what to dissapate and what to accentuate. Untill a point where the subconscious decides it is 'right'.

For instance in yesterdays image, information has been removed in order to make the foreground less of a distraction. The focus of the eye then goes to the structure in the distance, then follows the perspective lines of the reflecting lights, and onto discover the ghostly face. The eye has a journey across the image.

Todays image is also interesting in that the vanishing point of the window frame co-insides with those of the rail tracks. So much so that with a similar technique as yesterday, the wondow frame information is reduced to highlights that appear to be tracks as well. It gives a ghostly atmosphere as the 'feild' of tracks dissapear into the darkness.

I hope this is constructive in some way.

Keep up the interesting work David.

comment by east3rd at 12:39 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2004

Beautiful shot. Great job keeping just enough detail in the sky and just enough on the ground to make the photo work.

Thanks for posting the original of yesterday's image. All of my photos pass through photoshop in some way, normally for just contrast and levels adjustments. However, there are some that just beg for a lot more tweaking. I'm a firm beliver that the end result is more important than the process, and seeing other people's starting point helps inspire me to be more confident in experimenting.

comment by miklos at 12:44 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2004

I actually like this photo more than the previous one. it's more vintage, more sense of reality. The tones turned out good, the lighting and the details on the tracks are excellent.
It's weird that you kept the blue in the sky, but I like it because it gives the old effect a modern feel.
Once again, good manipulation.

comment by djn1 at 10:11 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2004

Salamander: no, I'm not a pro (though I'm attempting to make some progress in that direction). As for darkroom experience: I used to do quite a lot of b&w developing, but never got around to doing colour.

cam: as with a lot of my shots yesterday's 'evolved'. One of the tools that I think is most useful for digital work is Photoshop's Curves tool - I often spend 10 or 15 minutes trying out different settings till I get something that I know looks right, in my opinion at least.

east3rd: go for it :-)

comment by wookiee at 03:29 PM (GMT) on 17 September, 2004

I would like it a lot more without the flourescent lights reflecting in the window - because then it's not clear it's through a window, and you're left wondering why it all goes black at the vanishing point.

comment by Jason DeFillippo at 11:01 PM (GMT) on 24 September, 2004

I'm really glad you posted the before and after. I've been wondering exactly how much you're massaging each image. You told me in an email once that you don't like to crop after the shot so I find it interesting you don't mind modifying every other aspect of the image. To each their own :-) Your photoshop work is very impressive btw. I'm definitely going to look at your work from a different perspective now. A very different perspective. Thanks-