A friend came over this afternoon and we spent an hour wandering along the sea-front in the last of the afternoon's sun, on what turned out to be one of the most glorious days we've had in weeks. And I thought, of the 80 or 90 shots that I took, that around ten or so would probably be quite good.
But I was wrong.
For some reason there's something not quite right about most of them – either the light was too harsh, the composition was off, and so on. No matter, it was a pleasant and enjoyable walk.
As for this shot: I'm not sure it's the best of the ones I took but, for some reason, it quite appeals to me.
Oh, and if you've had trouble accessing chromasia during the last few hours it seems that there have been some server problems – I've had all sorts of problems uploading this entry. The static pages seem to load ok, but anything requiring cgi seems totally stuffed; i.e. posting an entry, opening the comments, and so on. When I did manage to get through to my control panel it's indicating that apache, cppop, cpsrvd, and ftpd have all failed, and the server load is running at around 20 – not good :-/
capture date camera lens focal length aperture shutter speed shooting mode exposure bias metering mode ISO flash image quality RAW converter cropped?
3.23pm on 2/12/04
Canon 20D
EF 70-200 f/4L USM
87mm (139mm equiv.)
f/4.0
1/160
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
DPP
no
comment byZach at 10:09 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2004
Here't to your "off" days! [raises glass] Makes my "good" days seem like crap-o-la! :)
Thanks Big D!
comment bytristan.net at 10:11 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2004
interesting shot, although it doesn't sing to me like most of your others.
comment bymiklos at 10:50 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2004
Did you know that this photo is posted twice? This and the previous?
Anyway. I don't care what anyone says, I like this. On the technical side, because of how clean and crisp it is. On the emotional side because this couple can look back at this years down the road, and show it to their child as well.
comment bydjn1 at 11:19 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2004
miklos: thanks, I've deleted the duplicate. And I guess it's the human angle I look about this shot too.
comment by Maxine at 11:41 PM (GMT) on 2 December, 2004
Gourgeous shot! Love the composition, colours and mood. Weel done!
comment byChelsea June at 01:05 AM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
Oh, well this photo certainly appeals to me as well. =) Great colors and composition. BTW where exactly do you live? - Its so beautiful there.
comment byTanner at 01:45 AM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
I love the colors in this shot, the reflection in the bottom left looks as though it could be the image, if you isolate it.
comment by isolated at 05:12 AM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
Are you up on a pier? You are obviously above them somewhere? And is that fog at the top of the picture?
comment by peterv at 05:53 AM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
A lovely shot - you've captured a good moment here - until I saw tthe footmarks I thought they were going to the R, and not the L. Good memories for someone.
Not sure I wouldn't have cropped (or even cloned) out that white wet area at the top. I know you don't like to that, but it's a bit distracting.
comment by steve deer at 07:42 AM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
nice dave. if I was to use this shot in a publication or ad I'd probably desaturate the blue baseball cap a little... but that's just me.
comment bydjn1 at 08:11 AM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
Chelsea: I live in Blackpool (UK, north west coast).
isolated: no, on the sea-front (which is about twelve feet above the beach at this point. And it's not fog, it's the way the light was catching that particular area of sand.
peterv: I quite like it, in a 'framing the shot' kind of way.
steve: you're quite right. I've now put up a different version where the hat isn't quite so vivid.
you know, the more i look at this one the more i like it. the reflections in the water, ribbed by the sand are excellent!
comment bykendall at 12:47 PM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
It's the 'otherworldly-looking-landscape' which catches me here. I realize it's just sand and some water, but the way it's framed makes it appear as something far more unique. The people 'stuck' (because they're carrying the stroller) here give it a good sense of reality. Whatever that means.. :) Anyways, nice!
comment by darrell at 01:41 PM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
A pleasant picture - more than a snap but not as 'arty' or conceptual as most of your recent images. The raised vantage point removes any possible distraction while the sand serves to provide a sufficient context. Nice how they are walking through the frame and about to leave it, creating a dynamic element. I think the refelection at the top is OK but is not required to frame the image. What would be nice IMO, is to position the people in the TL portion of the frame and catch more of thier reflection below.
Did you really take 90 pictures (RAW) in an hour while just out walking? Do you keep them all or review and delete as you go? What size CF cards do you have? Are you a shareholder in Lexar or Sandisk? Did you manage to talk to your friends while they visited?
Cheers
comment bydjn1 at 01:58 PM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
darrell: you're right about the composition but I couldn't place them any higher in the frame. Just in front of where they're walking there's a part of the sea-wall that slopes at about 30 to 40 degrees. Normally I wouldn't have minded including it but the sun was so low that all I would have captured would have been a load of blown-out glare.
As for CF cards: I have two Sandisk Ultra II 1GB cards and a 1GB microdrive. And yes, we did talk ;-) My friend is a photographer (who put my 20D to shame by wandering around with a 1Ds an 70-200 f/2.1 IS), so we'd purposely gone out to shoot. With anyone else I think my behaviour might have been construed as impolite ;-)
comment by darrell at 02:23 PM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
Dave, you weren't trying to compensate for the percieved superiority of mate's equipment were you? I think your images speak for themselves. The 20D is an excellent camera and as my wife says about my D100: "its not how many megapixels it has but what you do with them that counts". Wise womanly words and why I have no chance of getting a 12 megapixel DSLR for a few years yet!
comment bydjn1 at 03:31 PM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
lol: no I wasn't trying to compensate ;-)
comment byFrank at 06:55 PM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
Good photo, but an even better stroller. Those MacLaren Dreamers are built like trucks!
Are both adults laughing? What happens when you crop down to make them more of the focus? Is she engaging the child with her face?
comment bydjn1 at 09:20 PM (GMT) on 3 December, 2004
Thanks all :-)
Frank: the woman is laughing and/or talking to the child in the buggy and the man is smiling.
"A lovely shot - you’ve captured a good moment here - until I saw tthe footmarks I thought they were going to the R, and not the L. Good memories for someone."
So did I, because I assumed he would be walking backwards instead of asking his wife to do so! :P
comment by Todd Baker at 06:23 PM (GMT) on 24 December, 2004
Good point...looks like she's briefing him on just that point!
A friend came over this afternoon and we spent an hour wandering along the sea-front in the last of the afternoon's sun, on what turned out to be one of the most glorious days we've had in weeks. And I thought, of the 80 or 90 shots that I took, that around ten or so would probably be quite good.
But I was wrong.
For some reason there's something not quite right about most of them – either the light was too harsh, the composition was off, and so on. No matter, it was a pleasant and enjoyable walk.
As for this shot: I'm not sure it's the best of the ones I took but, for some reason, it quite appeals to me.
Oh, and if you've had trouble accessing chromasia during the last few hours it seems that there have been some server problems – I've had all sorts of problems uploading this entry. The static pages seem to load ok, but anything requiring cgi seems totally stuffed; i.e. posting an entry, opening the comments, and so on. When I did manage to get through to my control panel it's indicating that apache, cppop, cpsrvd, and ftpd have all failed, and the server load is running at around 20 – not good :-/
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
Canon 20D
EF 70-200 f/4L USM
87mm (139mm equiv.)
f/4.0
1/160
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
DPP
no
Here't to your "off" days! [raises glass] Makes my "good" days seem like crap-o-la! :)
Thanks Big D!
interesting shot, although it doesn't sing to me like most of your others.
Did you know that this photo is posted twice? This and the previous?
Anyway. I don't care what anyone says, I like this. On the technical side, because of how clean and crisp it is. On the emotional side because this couple can look back at this years down the road, and show it to their child as well.
miklos: thanks, I've deleted the duplicate. And I guess it's the human angle I look about this shot too.
Gourgeous shot! Love the composition, colours and mood. Weel done!
Oh, well this photo certainly appeals to me as well. =) Great colors and composition. BTW where exactly do you live? - Its so beautiful there.
I love the colors in this shot, the reflection in the bottom left looks as though it could be the image, if you isolate it.
Are you up on a pier? You are obviously above them somewhere? And is that fog at the top of the picture?
A lovely shot - you've captured a good moment here - until I saw tthe footmarks I thought they were going to the R, and not the L. Good memories for someone.
Not sure I wouldn't have cropped (or even cloned) out that white wet area at the top. I know you don't like to that, but it's a bit distracting.
nice dave. if I was to use this shot in a publication or ad I'd probably desaturate the blue baseball cap a little... but that's just me.
Chelsea: I live in Blackpool (UK, north west coast).
isolated: no, on the sea-front (which is about twelve feet above the beach at this point. And it's not fog, it's the way the light was catching that particular area of sand.
peterv: I quite like it, in a 'framing the shot' kind of way.
steve: you're quite right. I've now put up a different version where the hat isn't quite so vivid.
you know, the more i look at this one the more i like it. the reflections in the water, ribbed by the sand are excellent!
It's the 'otherworldly-looking-landscape' which catches me here. I realize it's just sand and some water, but the way it's framed makes it appear as something far more unique. The people 'stuck' (because they're carrying the stroller) here give it a good sense of reality. Whatever that means.. :) Anyways, nice!
A pleasant picture - more than a snap but not as 'arty' or conceptual as most of your recent images. The raised vantage point removes any possible distraction while the sand serves to provide a sufficient context. Nice how they are walking through the frame and about to leave it, creating a dynamic element. I think the refelection at the top is OK but is not required to frame the image. What would be nice IMO, is to position the people in the TL portion of the frame and catch more of thier reflection below.
Did you really take 90 pictures (RAW) in an hour while just out walking? Do you keep them all or review and delete as you go? What size CF cards do you have? Are you a shareholder in Lexar or Sandisk? Did you manage to talk to your friends while they visited?
Cheers
darrell: you're right about the composition but I couldn't place them any higher in the frame. Just in front of where they're walking there's a part of the sea-wall that slopes at about 30 to 40 degrees. Normally I wouldn't have minded including it but the sun was so low that all I would have captured would have been a load of blown-out glare.
As for CF cards: I have two Sandisk Ultra II 1GB cards and a 1GB microdrive. And yes, we did talk ;-) My friend is a photographer (who put my 20D to shame by wandering around with a 1Ds an 70-200 f/2.1 IS), so we'd purposely gone out to shoot. With anyone else I think my behaviour might have been construed as impolite ;-)
Dave, you weren't trying to compensate for the percieved superiority of mate's equipment were you? I think your images speak for themselves. The 20D is an excellent camera and as my wife says about my D100: "its not how many megapixels it has but what you do with them that counts". Wise womanly words and why I have no chance of getting a 12 megapixel DSLR for a few years yet!
lol: no I wasn't trying to compensate ;-)
Good photo, but an even better stroller. Those MacLaren Dreamers are built like trucks!
Are both adults laughing? What happens when you crop down to make them more of the focus? Is she engaging the child with her face?
Thanks all :-)
Frank: the woman is laughing and/or talking to the child in the buggy and the man is smiling.
Earlier, peterv commented:
So did I, because I assumed he would be walking backwards instead of asking his wife to do so! :P
Good point...looks like she's briefing him on just that point!