<<< o >>>the wind and the sky 39 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

I found this strange device down by the South Shore (Blackpool). It's a sculpture of sorts – that's wind activated – and seems to work on much the same principle as a church organ. Oh, and as I didn't include any foreground detail it's a bit difficult to judge the scale – I'd estimate that it's between 40 and 50 feet high.

As always, let me know what you think. And I would write more, but it's one minute to midnight and I hate back-dating stuff (i.e. if I don't put this up now it will be tomorrow ;-)

Update: this is version two of this shot (I changed it after quasi's comment below). The original one that I put up had two white balance settings applied via a mask, the first (the device) was set 'as shot', and the sky was altered to a more natural shade of blue. However, I think, on this occasion (especially since I cleaned my sensor earlier this evening and didn't do a particularly good job of it), that I probably pushed this image a bit further than I should have done. So here's a 'straighter', but weirder version.

Update #2: I just put up a copy of the original if anyone's interested:

.../archives/wind_and_the_sky.php

capture date
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
9.12pm on 8/12/04
Canon 20D
EF 17-40 f/4L USM
24mm (38mm equiv.)
f/8.0
2m 0s
manual
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
DPP
no
 
3x2 + night shots [long exposures] + fylde coast [scenic]
comment by CTC at 12:23 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Dave, the colours are rich and compelling. I enjoy the diagonal composition, however, I found myself wanting to look at the image in portrait instead of landscape. (There was some head tilting involved.) Maybe this is due to the colour fading from deep blue, to lighter blue horizontally, instead of vertically. Intersting subject/materials and rich colour. Nice one.

comment by ojorojo at 12:23 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Strange shot, I like it. Due to the shape of the clouds, it seems more like a vertical pix published as a horinzontal. One question, what is this DPP raw converter???

comment by frisky? at 12:37 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

nice and weird looking thing. looks like a wing and a guitar or something... Im still waiting for that 45-min exposure shot! ;-)

comment by djn1 at 12:40 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

OK, the rotation (which I forgot to mention) didn't quite work. Give me a few minutes and I'll put it up in portrait format.

comment by djn1 at 12:43 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

frisky: I had every intention of doing a long exposure shot of my favourite object this evening but, while the sky was reasonably clear, there was a lot of ground mist that caused way too much light pollution ... so I gave up.

comment by Chelsea June at 12:51 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

This is a great shot! I like the colors and perspective. Very cool. =)

comment by djn1 at 12:51 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

ojorojo: DPP raw converter is the software that Canon bundle with the 20D, 1D mkII, and IDs mkII.

comment by Stuart at 01:20 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

This is stunning (so much so that it makes a very long time lurker speak). The colours in both the sculpture and the sky are incredible. The sculpture is an interesting subject, full of detail and decay, and the diagonal works well for me.

comment by george at 01:35 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Nice photograph and lovely colours. I was wondering though, but do you see brownish-green bands going up and down the picture?

comment by djn1 at 03:22 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

george: now that you mention it, yes, just about. I cleaned my sensor earlier this evening (PecPad and Eclipse method) and didn't do a very good job of it; i.e. too much fluid = streaks on the sensor. I hadn't noticed until you mentioned it.

I've now cleaned it again (several times) and think I'm getting the hang of it but it's rather nerve-wracking :-/

comment by quasi at 03:28 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

A really strange and beautiful photo. I love it, but I see a lot of strange blocky JPEG artifacts in the dark part of the sky. Since you shot this in RAW, I assume it isn't in the original...? It might just be my monitor settings. Sorry if this is just me. :)

comment by djn1 at 03:54 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

quasi: no, I suspect it isn't just you (though I can't see them on my setup) – see my update above for an explanation.

comment by quasi at 03:57 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Amazing! I love this version as well, though I'd like to see a side-by-side comparison with the old one -- I'm not sure which one I prefer.

comment by djn1 at 04:01 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

quasi: normally I'd put it up, but it's 4am here and in my half-asleep state I just overwrote the original version :-/

comment by nathan at 04:01 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

i love this shot. i agree - it looks like a guitar. that was my first impression. i wish i would have seen the original post.

comment by djn1 at 04:13 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

nathan (and quasi): I really should get some sleep soon, but I just realised that my backup ran not long after I put this up so I did have a copy of the original after all.

comment by bob at 04:39 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

This is great! I looked at the original and like it but this is better. The warm color of the sky gives it a Martian-like feel.

Excellent!

comment by riff at 05:11 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

very nice capture.. its either the tail of a very evil seahorse statue thats been buried head first, or something thats along the lines of a banjo? ;)

for some reason, i prefer the original more.

comment by Carlos at 05:12 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Great shot. You are becoming good with night shots.

comment by miles at 05:57 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

beauiful, I like the original best tho.

comment by peterv at 06:22 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

I prefer the original image, with the darker blue sky. First portrait shot of yours I've seen.

comment by yp at 06:59 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

sheesh. incredible.

comment by Henning at 09:17 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Is the "thing" "lit" in some way? I mean, you can't have lit it up yourself? Or is it the sun (sundown) that makes the "thing" so orange against the deep blue of the sky?

comment by RainKing at 10:17 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Really cool shot. I want to do long exposures, too, but it's too damn cold at the moment. I was wondering was kind of light surrounded the device, or if it was totally dark and it was lit by the moon/stars/etc.

comment by n3on at 11:45 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Hmm a portrait ? I thaught you put only landscape photos on you'r site... Nice shot though, technically it's brilliant, I can't see any noise!

comment by miklos at 11:47 AM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

both versions are awesome.

comment by east3rd at 01:14 PM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

OK... Is there any way we can have all of the cool wacky photogenic stuff shipped from Blackpool to my neighborhood? :) Anyway, I love both versions... though I prefer your processed one. The color shift in the background makes the scene more jarring and "sci-fi". Beautiful work, as always.

comment by picturegrl at 01:21 PM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

I love the colors in this shot, and I prefer it to the original. You are lucky to have so many interesting things in your city. It makes me wonder how many cool things I pass by each day but no longer "see." The lack of noise is incredible.

comment by graceshu at 03:30 PM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

awesome shit :D
i like the original one better though. this one has a sinister feel to it. like a evil zitar or something.

comment by m at 03:57 PM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Both old and new very cool :)
Like new best I think ;-)

comment by Ben at 04:22 PM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

I love the second one, it grabs me more than the original. The colors are amazing.

I'm about to have to clean my 20D's sensor as well (same method as you) and I understand your nervousness. :)

comment by mark at 04:43 PM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Awesome shot. Love the color tone...at first i liked the new version alot better, but now (after flipping back and forth numerous times), the original is growing on me.

All in all, the new one is the best most striking shot...

comment by john at 06:15 PM (GMT) on 9 December, 2004

Yeah, I was going to make the guitar joke...

Nice colors...

comment by djn1 at 12:09 AM (GMT) on 10 December, 2004

Thanks all :-)

Henning and RainKing: yes, it's lit by the street lights.

east3rd: no ;-)

Ben: sensor cleaning, I've discovered, is not one of my favourite tasks :-/

comment by photogene at 12:55 AM (GMT) on 10 December, 2004

?!? where do you find these odd structures?!

comment by ViSuaLLyMiNDeD at 06:04 PM (GMT) on 12 December, 2004

Wow, what great perspective. This is funny; when I first saw the photo, I thought it looked like an instrument, but a funny looking guitar, not an organ. The colors are great, very dramatic.

comment by Andrew at 10:10 PM (GMT) on 13 December, 2004

This shot seems to be out of this world. How do you put two while balance settings via a mask?

comment by pierre at 07:55 AM (GMT) on 14 December, 2004

Excellent
Could be a sci-fi novel illustration :)

comment by tobias at 08:47 AM (GMT) on 22 February, 2005

I have to comment on this. Makes me think of a structure that may appear in an Isaac Asimov novel. Or post holocaust.

Very (I mean VERY) eerie...