<<< o >>>in front of our eyes 24 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

On and off, I've wanted a macro lens for about twenty years, and this morning mine finally arrived, and in between doing a million and one other things today I managed to take a few shots. What I hadn't realised was just how difficult it is to compose a shot with the shallow DoF at maximum magnification – it really can't be more than a couple of millimetres at f/2.8, ... if that. Anyway, this shot isn't quite what I was after – that will have to wait for another day – but it was the best I could come up with while hand-holding the lens and trying to photograph our fidgety three year old ;-)

More small things to follow ...

capture date
camera
lens
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
2.43pm on 29/1/05
Canon 20D
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
f/4.5
1/60
manual
+0.0
evaluative
100
580EX
RAW
C1 Pro
minor
 
3x2 + children + macro
comment by Danielle_SC247 at 11:09 PM (GMT) on 29 January, 2005

I really want a marco lens. I keep taking close up pictures of things hoping my camera lens will somehow turn into one. But no, never does. Taking pictures of little kids (and have them do what you want) is hard. Very nice job, though. I like this picture, though I like pretty much all of yours.

comment by Inorog at 11:40 PM (GMT) on 29 January, 2005

This photo is more expressive in vignette than in full size. I wonder why...

comment by bob at 11:50 PM (GMT) on 29 January, 2005

Be still my beating heart --- wow! ... congrats on the lens -- but really, that's an aweseome shot Dave... I love the images of your children -- always my favorites... beautifully done... outstanding....

comment by Chelsea June at 12:02 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Oh I love the soft color in this! Such an interesting macro shot. I loved the image yesterday as well the colors in it were stunning. =)

comment by graceshu at 12:21 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

/weeps! ;'(

comment by Ariel Bravy at 12:24 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Oh wow, it looks like you're going to be having some fun with your new lens. Enjoy!

comment by Chris at 01:06 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Very nice job. Eyes are incredibly hard to do, especially withOUT a macro. The two best attempts at my own eye (which are completely devoid of youth and far from wrinkle-free, even at my age) are here:

http://www.fabricated.ca/stuff/My_Eye2.jpg
http://www.fabricated.ca/stuff/BlueEye3.jpg

I like the fact that in your shot, the eye itself is nearly completely obscured, and yet still discernable.

comment by tanner at 01:47 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

I'm pretty impressed with this as one of your first macro shot. I've tried to do a few of my girlfriends eye with no luck.

One interesting thing you can do to get a cheap macro effect would be to take any of your lenses off your camera and turn them around completely (shoot through them backwards)

It's fun to play with.

comment by tobias at 02:43 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Dave,

Whatever... perfect.

Wish I woud have such difficulty ;)

Abstract yet brilliant.. Reminds me of that shot you did, head down in black and white

http://www.chromasia.com/iblog/archives/0412142147_clean.php

In fact the first image I ever saw on your site. A true masterpiece.

comment by tobias at 02:47 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

tech stuff

what lens is it?

i'm looking to get a canon ef extension tube. 25 i think it's referred to as. i hate spending more than i have to....

comment by MsCantBWrong at 08:42 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Very nice. Makes me so much more excited for my 100mm f2.8 that I have been promised in May. 3 months. 96 days to be precise! Whee!

I love the hair. It's almost like a radiograph.

comment by Amit Karmakar at 09:00 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Awesome dreamy capture David. BTW got my 20D this month :)

comment by Mexipickle at 11:11 AM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

I must admit, when I first saw this, I thought it was a Barbie or some other doll eye. Pretty impressive that your daughter could be still long enough for you to shoot this!

comment by Daaave at 04:14 PM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

David, I'm interested as to why you decided to buy this particular lens (not that I think anything about is bad, just because I'm interested in your thought process, as I'll hopefully be buying some real glass too in a few months). I think I'm right in saying that you only own Canon lenses, so have you ever considered third-party variants or from your experience is the quality of Canon lenses hard to beat?

Also why this focal length? If cost wasn't an issue, woud you have preferred the 180mm f/3.5L? Or perhaps it's something to do with the distance front the front of the lens to the subject being too great?...

Talking of which, how far away from your daughter were you when you took this? Cool photo btw.

comment by picturegrl at 05:19 PM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Very nice. I like the colors in this. The almost high key feel to it adds to the sense of innocence. And it doesn't hurt that your daughter has beautiful eyelashes, so long and thick. The strand of hair falling across the lashes disturbs me a little, and I would sort of like to see just a tiny bit more of the eye, but I can understand how hard it is to photograph little ones who are always on the move. Gorgeous.

comment by Richy at 06:02 PM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Macro shooting is great, and macro with a macro lense is hit or miss.

Nice picture, as usual, but if I may add a comment, I would say that this would have been great with a mid-format camera with a very luminous macro lense.

comment by Beth at 07:21 PM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

I'm officially jealous! Very cool!! I gotta get me a macro lens!

comment by djn1 at 08:51 PM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Thanks everyone.

tobias: it's odd you should mention that shot as this is the same daughter. For some reason that I can't work out I find her the easiest to photograph of all of our daughters, which is odd, because she's by far and away the least co-operative and most jumpy of them all. As for the lens, it's the 100mm f/2.8 macro.

Amit: congrats - you'll have fun :-)

Daaave: I went for this lens for a couple of reasons. First: from the reviews I've read all the Canon macro lenses outperform the 3rd party alternatives. Second: I got the 100mm rather than i) the 50mm because it has life size magnification and a longer working distance, and ii) the 180mm because it's over twice as expensive and was beyond my budget. And I'm not sure how far away I was as I haven't got used to the lens yet but I guess about four inches.

Richy: I'm not sure what you mean by a "very luminous macro lens".

Beth: I've only used it for a day but I can see this turning into one of my favourite lenses. If you can run to one I'd definitely recommend getting one.

comment by Marcus at 11:24 PM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Nice shot David, I'm sure you're enjoy your macro lens, it opens up a whole new world.

Here's a macro lens on the cheap, my homemade bellows lens, but don't expect super sharp optics. Plus you must have an understanding subject, since you sometimes need to lean in and out for proper focus, you wouldn't want to bump them.

I've had good experience with extension tubes and another trick is to turn your lens around and shoot through it backwards. Not sure if you digital guys want to try that one or not, but it works great for manual film cameras.

comment by djn1 at 11:32 PM (GMT) on 30 January, 2005

Marcus: thanks for the link, your lens looks great. You might be interested in this lens, a home-made selective focus lens developed by John at orbit1.

comment by Marcus at 01:15 AM (GMT) on 31 January, 2005

yeh. John and Justin at chromgenic were my inspiration for creating my lens. Good stuff!

comment by Nick at 02:51 PM (GMT) on 5 February, 2005

I just got one of those lenses myself. I've started using it for photos on my food blog, among other things. I look forward to seeing what else you'll do with yours.

comment by kane at 04:46 PM (GMT) on 11 February, 2005

Just by looking at those long dark lashes, I knew this shot was of your daughter.

comment by Keith at 02:24 AM (GMT) on 7 June, 2005

My favorite of all your pictures (and I love most of them). I probably own you money since I have been using it as wallpaper for about a month now. Thanks.