This shot nearly didn't get posted because I just couldn't get the colour balance right. I really wanted to put the colour version of this shot up – the contrast between the warmth of the sand and the rich blueness of the sky should have been stunning – but it just didn't work. And I don't know why, it just didn't look right. So, and I guess I'm quite pleased about this really, here's a colorised version that I think is much better – more balanced, and quite a bit more dramatic.
capture date camera lens aperture shutter speed shooting mode exposure bias metering mode ISO flash image quality RAW converter cropped?
3.43pm on 5/2/05
Canon 20D
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
f/8.0
1/160
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
no
comment byKyle at 09:10 PM (GMT) on 7 February, 2005
nice image. it looks very abstract but i like the color i think that it has a feel to it.
kyle
comment byowen at 09:25 PM (GMT) on 7 February, 2005
fantastically abstract foreground - it took me ages to work out that it was just sand. Amazing clouds in the distance - did you get any shots where they are more prominent?
comment byTed Morrow at 09:46 PM (GMT) on 7 February, 2005
This is confusing - in a good way. I immediately thought it was picture taken from a fast moving car! Nice photo, as always.
Ted
comment by ellehm at 10:08 PM (GMT) on 7 February, 2005
really really good picture!!
comment byAndy at 10:22 PM (GMT) on 7 February, 2005
Very nice dramatic and abstract picture. This is more for my curiosity ... do you think you would mind putting up the color version of this picture even though you said that you could not get the "color balance" right. Anyway I just wanted to see what problem you were dealing with.
comment byTravis at 10:42 PM (GMT) on 7 February, 2005
Dramatic you say? I'll do you one better, how bout frightening? The fact that there are no people in the image and the scale is really difficult to tell leaves me with a total sense of danger. Shadows can do many things for an image. You've utilized them here to really accentuate the unknown. I love that. I would be interested to see what this image looked like if you embraced this sense of foreboding and really brought down the brightness in the image. Specifically the upper rand hand corner. Damn fine beach photo!
comment byFellow Eskimo at 11:08 PM (GMT) on 7 February, 2005
Very nice photo, indeed. I do not think the sepia/color looks quite right. Especally not for the sky. But the foreground loks very intresting. I would love to see a color version of this.
comment bydjn1 at 11:24 PM (GMT) on 7 February, 2005
Thanks all.
As for the colour version: there isn't one, at least not one I can produce immediately (and I don't have time to do another one today). The problem, in this case, is that the image was converted to black and white with the channel mixer prior to me making two Curves adjustments to this image – one to the sky, and one to the foreground. What this now means is that the colours are totally off.
The original problem, which was a bit simpler, was what seemed to me to be a colour clash between the cyan of the sky and the almost rust-tinged sand. It may have been the case that people would have liked it that way, and if I get time towards the end of this week I may do another version, but for me it just didn't work.
Travis: because this scene is so familiar for me – it's our local beach, the shadows from the pier, a familiar horizon – I can't 'see' this as frightening. It's overly dramatised – in the sense that it's non-representational – but I don't find it foreboding.
I'd be interested to see what you make of tomorrow's shot.
comment by m at 11:33 PM (GMT) on 7 February, 2005
It is in the style of work by a famous photographer (or maybe not so famous ;-), however I can't recall who. Anyone esle know who I mean?
comment byjyoseph at 12:07 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
This is great!
At first glance it almost appears as though you are moving. The direction and pattern of the shadows give that impression. Beautiful photo!
comment byF. Castilho at 01:53 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
yeah, I was fooled too, I thought it was taken from a moving car
comment by billy at 06:13 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
Honestly, I don't like the foreground. The shadows ans lack of color make it hard to *identify* what i'm looking at. however, the background--the mountains and clouds--are very dramatic
comment byDavid at 07:28 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
What is casting the shadows - a combination of trees and clouds? They serve the image well stacking up layers underneath the impending storm. The problem, or benefit, is that the eye is uncertain where to focus - on the foreground or background - because of the extraordinary depth of field the shadows create.
comment byJoe M. at 07:32 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
Who cares if you can't tell what you're looking at? This is a good photo.
comment bydjn1 at 09:13 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
David: the shadows are being cast by Blackpool's North Pier.
comment byciro at 10:31 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
Wow. Very nice.
comment bypierre at 11:00 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
Nice photo
(again)
comment byKy at 11:25 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
I found the picture a bit frightening too .. didn't realize it was a beach .. Very nice, catching picture!!
comment bychris at 11:35 AM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
Like others I initially thought this was an image created by movement eg from a car; but as has been mentioned, the actuality is of no relevance - the image works because of solid composition / correct exposure etc. Great shot.
comment byRainKing at 03:18 PM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
I don't know about the color version, but this works very well in my book. I love the sepia-ish tones.
comment bymiklos at 03:59 PM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
Beautiful? I don't know.. It seems like it's all over the place.. It's too real to be abstract, but too abstract to be 'real'.. does that make sense? I guess that I'm all over the place too :) ..
Anyway, Dave, what are those spots everywhere in the picture? Like on the left side in the clouds (about 1/3 in from the left side of the photo), some on the right side by the horizon.. Some at the top of that shadowy area that looks like an O .. Some at the bottom right side of it..
Hot pixels? Can't really tell at first, if you just quickly glance over the photo, but once you notice them, you can't stop looking at them :) .. It makes the shot feel "dirty" ..
comment bydjn1 at 04:44 PM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
miklos: the spots on the horizon are people (I think), the ones above the 'O' are stones/pebbles on the beach, and the ones in the clouds may be birds. I guess I could have spot-edited them out, but I don't find them particularly bothersome.
comment by VPra at 07:29 PM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
cool
comment byAdriana at 07:44 PM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
The good thing of beeing late for an entry is that you already answered all my cuestions (Lol). I realized imediatly that it was a beach but I didn't know what the shadows where from.
comment byjohn at 07:50 PM (GMT) on 8 February, 2005
Another example why you are # 1
comment bymyla at 03:59 AM (GMT) on 9 February, 2005
This shot really sort of visualizes how I feel today -- wonderful shot.
comment byzerosun at 05:08 AM (GMT) on 9 February, 2005
wow. i'd love to see the color version, but with the subject matter here, its pretty stunning as is.
comment byJesse at 06:20 AM (GMT) on 9 February, 2005
I found it difficult to connect to this image because I couldn't relate with the foreground. However, I looked the link of what cast the shadows, and that helped me appreciate the shadows. Oh, my limited mind :-).
comment by Dale Kewthrey at 02:28 PM (GMT) on 10 February, 2005
Too much Photoshop. Too little photography. Sorry.
comment byYvette at 01:53 AM (GMT) on 14 February, 2005
I love the lines - great colorization choice too!
comment byEric Hancock at 04:25 AM (GMT) on 16 February, 2005
This shot nearly didn't get posted because I just couldn't get the colour balance right. I really wanted to put the colour version of this shot up – the contrast between the warmth of the sand and the rich blueness of the sky should have been stunning – but it just didn't work. And I don't know why, it just didn't look right. So, and I guess I'm quite pleased about this really, here's a colorised version that I think is much better – more balanced, and quite a bit more dramatic.
camera
lens
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
Canon 20D
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
f/8.0
1/160
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
no
nice image. it looks very abstract but i like the color i think that it has a feel to it.
kyle
fantastically abstract foreground - it took me ages to work out that it was just sand. Amazing clouds in the distance - did you get any shots where they are more prominent?
This is confusing - in a good way. I immediately thought it was picture taken from a fast moving car! Nice photo, as always.
Ted
really really good picture!!
Very nice dramatic and abstract picture. This is more for my curiosity ... do you think you would mind putting up the color version of this picture even though you said that you could not get the "color balance" right. Anyway I just wanted to see what problem you were dealing with.
Dramatic you say? I'll do you one better, how bout frightening? The fact that there are no people in the image and the scale is really difficult to tell leaves me with a total sense of danger. Shadows can do many things for an image. You've utilized them here to really accentuate the unknown. I love that. I would be interested to see what this image looked like if you embraced this sense of foreboding and really brought down the brightness in the image. Specifically the upper rand hand corner. Damn fine beach photo!
Very nice photo, indeed. I do not think the sepia/color looks quite right. Especally not for the sky. But the foreground loks very intresting. I would love to see a color version of this.
Thanks all.
As for the colour version: there isn't one, at least not one I can produce immediately (and I don't have time to do another one today). The problem, in this case, is that the image was converted to black and white with the channel mixer prior to me making two Curves adjustments to this image – one to the sky, and one to the foreground. What this now means is that the colours are totally off.
The original problem, which was a bit simpler, was what seemed to me to be a colour clash between the cyan of the sky and the almost rust-tinged sand. It may have been the case that people would have liked it that way, and if I get time towards the end of this week I may do another version, but for me it just didn't work.
Travis: because this scene is so familiar for me – it's our local beach, the shadows from the pier, a familiar horizon – I can't 'see' this as frightening. It's overly dramatised – in the sense that it's non-representational – but I don't find it foreboding.
I'd be interested to see what you make of tomorrow's shot.
It is in the style of work by a famous photographer (or maybe not so famous ;-), however I can't recall who. Anyone esle know who I mean?
This is great!
At first glance it almost appears as though you are moving. The direction and pattern of the shadows give that impression. Beautiful photo!
yeah, I was fooled too, I thought it was taken from a moving car
Honestly, I don't like the foreground. The shadows ans lack of color make it hard to *identify* what i'm looking at. however, the background--the mountains and clouds--are very dramatic
What is casting the shadows - a combination of trees and clouds? They serve the image well stacking up layers underneath the impending storm. The problem, or benefit, is that the eye is uncertain where to focus - on the foreground or background - because of the extraordinary depth of field the shadows create.
Who cares if you can't tell what you're looking at? This is a good photo.
David: the shadows are being cast by Blackpool's North Pier.
Wow. Very nice.
Nice photo
(again)
I found the picture a bit frightening too .. didn't realize it was a beach .. Very nice, catching picture!!
Like others I initially thought this was an image created by movement eg from a car; but as has been mentioned, the actuality is of no relevance - the image works because of solid composition / correct exposure etc. Great shot.
I don't know about the color version, but this works very well in my book. I love the sepia-ish tones.
Beautiful? I don't know.. It seems like it's all over the place.. It's too real to be abstract, but too abstract to be 'real'.. does that make sense? I guess that I'm all over the place too :) ..
Anyway, Dave, what are those spots everywhere in the picture? Like on the left side in the clouds (about 1/3 in from the left side of the photo), some on the right side by the horizon.. Some at the top of that shadowy area that looks like an O .. Some at the bottom right side of it..
Hot pixels? Can't really tell at first, if you just quickly glance over the photo, but once you notice them, you can't stop looking at them :) .. It makes the shot feel "dirty" ..
miklos: the spots on the horizon are people (I think), the ones above the 'O' are stones/pebbles on the beach, and the ones in the clouds may be birds. I guess I could have spot-edited them out, but I don't find them particularly bothersome.
cool
The good thing of beeing late for an entry is that you already answered all my cuestions (Lol). I realized imediatly that it was a beach but I didn't know what the shadows where from.
Another example why you are # 1
This shot really sort of visualizes how I feel today -- wonderful shot.
wow. i'd love to see the color version, but with the subject matter here, its pretty stunning as is.
I found it difficult to connect to this image because I couldn't relate with the foreground. However, I looked the link of what cast the shadows, and that helped me appreciate the shadows. Oh, my limited mind :-).
Too much Photoshop. Too little photography. Sorry.
I love the lines - great colorization choice too!
Nice shot.