My apologies for not writing much to accompany my recent entries, but I've just not had the time. As for this shot, and hence the title, it's a shot of Blackpool's Central pier taken from the North pier.
A quick update: Eskimo commented that this looks a bit jagged around the bar. This is light catching the metal rather than a resizing/sharpening artefact, and I did wonder about removing it in this version but didn't have the time to do it convincingly. Suffice to say that it's part of the shot and not a digital error, even if it does look like one ;-)
Update #2: Henning commented that the sky appeared a bit blotchy on this one so I thought I'd rework it. The original version was converted to black and white using the channel mixer to extract the red channel, mostly to get a bit more depth into a relatively flat sky. But because there's also quite a dramatic increase in contrast with this shot things became a bit blotchy. Anyway, to cut a long story short, I converted it to black and white using two Hue/Saturation adjustment layers, the top one set to desaturate the image, and the bottom one set to 'Color' blend mode (so that you can alter the Hue slider to control the final appearance of the image).
capture date camera lens aperture shutter speed shooting mode exposure bias metering mode ISO flash image quality RAW converter cropped?
2.24pm on 17/3/05
Canon 20D
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
f/14.0
1/500
aperture priority
-2/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
minor
comment byRamboHoHo at 08:39 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
Cannot understand the photo. :)
comment byFellow Eskimo at 08:39 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
I really like the toning on this one, and that the foreground is sharp. However, around the bar it seems to be a little jagged (around the circles), but that is just pickyness. I really do like it :)
comment byRyan Rahn at 08:40 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
Great lines and contrast!
comment byluminouslens at 09:04 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
comment byAdriana at 09:12 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
I really enjoy yesterdays's entrie. This one is pretty original too. But it seems a little dark for me. Any way it may be just my screen's settings.
comment byRobyn P. at 09:45 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
I really like this - kind of like peering through a window - its really dark and moody too, which I like, but others may find depressing...
comment byDaniel G. at 09:48 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
Very good use of depth of field. Beatful work with arcs and curves. I like this one.
comment bynordilux at 09:49 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
dave, this one is very nice indeed. the separation between fore- and background gives it depth, the contrast and greytones make it very graphical and you manage to repeat the circular theme in both places. very skilled indeed.
comment bynogger at 09:56 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
Ok. Mmmmm.... I had a bug about yesterday's and I have one about today's.
Couldn't work out what it was yesterday but I think I can now. I think they're the wrong way round re what's in focus and what isn't. More so with today's.
This is, of course, just a personal opinion. But that's what I think. For what it's worth.
I will now close the bunker door. :-)
comment byhenning at 10:04 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
It’s a clever shot, but it doesn’t stir any feelings. Maybe it’s too sterile or thought out?
Also, I’m experiencing some »blotchyness« in the sky and out of focus areas. It looks like jpg-artefacts, but I’m not sure.
comment byBeth at 10:17 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
The council/tourist board should totally be paying you. Much better than some of the Little and Large posters I saw about town. :) This is really unique and lovely!
comment byMOIN UDDIN at 11:00 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
DAMN!!! Simply beautiful!!!
comment by Chris at 11:24 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
Great balance in this shot. I really like how the bar cuts through.
comment byAlex at 11:27 PM (GMT) on 17 March, 2005
the funny thing about this is that, because of the stark contrast in color intensity (black as opposed to a subtle grey) the {rail?} almost looks superimposed on the image. with the jagged bits (anti-aliasing) it COULD pass as one of those cutesy little brushes off deviant art that we love so much.
oh, we DO love them.
anyways. whilst not portfolio worthy, i do think you should experiment more with DoF. perhaps not as much as i do {shameless plug} CLICK ME DAMMIT {/shameless plug} and not in a huge spree like with the fisheye lens.. but all the same. people work wonderfully well :)
off topic. ish:
i'm glad you put this up. in some respects - though i know you're into experimenting and whatnot - this is most definately a step up from some of the recent pictures. that said, i can't help but love the novelty of capturing a chav in his element, and yet.. your camera is still in tact! amazing - really.
hugs o-(".)-o
comment byRaffi at 03:28 AM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
Ooooh I like I like! Definately good depth in this shot.
comment bysari at 08:11 AM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
i like the idea to repeat the circular theme. it gives continuity.
comment by farah at 09:00 AM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
i dont know much about photography and skills.. but this entry is superb! * like all your entries as well =) *
comment by tobias at 09:15 AM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
I agree with Adriana, a little dark maybe.
I love the compostion though, wich is a major flaw of mine I feel, not getting the right shot but I will be cheating in future and just cropping until the image is good.
I don't know why but I keep feeling the need for a bigger (deeper) DoF, it does make me feel that the photogrpaher went for the wheel but failed to focus correctly and "missed" it.
Again, the composition is great, the curves very complimentary and great framing.
comment by tobias at 09:18 AM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
Yes definitely, the blurred wheel really bugs me and as Robyn P has said, I feel the darkness depressing but not in an atmospheric way. Strange, the shot is great yet misses and those two points and just frustrates. Do it again Dave...
...do it again!
comment byhenning at 09:23 AM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
Much better, Dave. Thanks for the tip on BW conversion! I know what you mean with th channel mixer, things can get blotchy when using (too) much of one channel.
comment byOrthodox at 12:36 PM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
It looks not very spontaneous to me, but a lot of elaboration can be seen in this shot. i like the symethry and curves and curves and curves ... :)
comment by VPra at 01:26 PM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
Nice title for it. :)
comment byDavid at 01:54 PM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
David
Been lurking and admiring your work for a while. I've got myself a 20D, so in theory I can take shots just like yours! In theory.
Just wondering how you learned digital processing - trial and error, a book, a course? If book could you recommend something? I can find my way around Photoshop but when it comes to tarting up images it's all a bit hit and miss (usually miss). I'm trialing Bibble Pro for RAW processing (didn't like Capture One Pro - price / interface).
Thanks.
comment bywr7259 at 03:33 PM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
great shot!
comment byJamey at 06:05 PM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
It seems like it needs another element to really make the composition complete. Perhaps something at a distance bewteen the front and rear elements. Other than that, well done.
comment bydjn1 at 06:31 PM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
Thanks everyone.
nogger: I don't think either today's or yesterday's would have worked if I'd inverted the focus.
Beth: I shall tell them you said so ;-)
Alex: ok, more experimentation tomorrow.
Adriana and tobias: I did try a lighter version, but it wasn't very effective.
David: try 'Adobe Photoshop CS for Photographers (by Martin Evening) and/or The Photoshop CS Book for Digital Photographers (by Scott Kelby). I prefer the former, but both are good.
Jamey: I can see what you mean, but I quite like the simplicity of this one.
comment byEric Hancock at 07:32 PM (GMT) on 18 March, 2005
Oh yeah, I love this shot. I remember seeing this a few months ago, and it always stuck with me. Really well seen. I love how the arcs of the foreground thingy are echoed in the ferris wheel.
comment by adena at 09:01 PM (GMT) on 3 January, 2006
My apologies for not writing much to accompany my recent entries, but I've just not had the time. As for this shot, and hence the title, it's a shot of Blackpool's Central pier taken from the North pier.
A quick update: Eskimo commented that this looks a bit jagged around the bar. This is light catching the metal rather than a resizing/sharpening artefact, and I did wonder about removing it in this version but didn't have the time to do it convincingly. Suffice to say that it's part of the shot and not a digital error, even if it does look like one ;-)
Update #2: Henning commented that the sky appeared a bit blotchy on this one so I thought I'd rework it. The original version was converted to black and white using the channel mixer to extract the red channel, mostly to get a bit more depth into a relatively flat sky. But because there's also quite a dramatic increase in contrast with this shot things became a bit blotchy. Anyway, to cut a long story short, I converted it to black and white using two Hue/Saturation adjustment layers, the top one set to desaturate the image, and the bottom one set to 'Color' blend mode (so that you can alter the Hue slider to control the final appearance of the image).
camera
lens
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
Canon 20D
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
f/14.0
1/500
aperture priority
-2/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
minor
Cannot understand the photo. :)
I really like the toning on this one, and that the foreground is sharp. However, around the bar it seems to be a little jagged (around the circles), but that is just pickyness. I really do like it :)
Great lines and contrast!
I really love the composition of this photo.
I really like this photo's circumfrances theme :)
* ehem...I meant circumference :P
I really enjoy yesterdays's entrie. This one is pretty original too. But it seems a little dark for me. Any way it may be just my screen's settings.
I really like this - kind of like peering through a window - its really dark and moody too, which I like, but others may find depressing...
Very good use of depth of field. Beatful work with arcs and curves. I like this one.
dave, this one is very nice indeed. the separation between fore- and background gives it depth, the contrast and greytones make it very graphical and you manage to repeat the circular theme in both places. very skilled indeed.
Ok. Mmmmm.... I had a bug about yesterday's and I have one about today's.
Couldn't work out what it was yesterday but I think I can now. I think they're the wrong way round re what's in focus and what isn't. More so with today's.
This is, of course, just a personal opinion. But that's what I think. For what it's worth.
I will now close the bunker door. :-)
It’s a clever shot, but it doesn’t stir any feelings. Maybe it’s too sterile or thought out?
Also, I’m experiencing some »blotchyness« in the sky and out of focus areas. It looks like jpg-artefacts, but I’m not sure.
The council/tourist board should totally be paying you. Much better than some of the Little and Large posters I saw about town. :) This is really unique and lovely!
DAMN!!! Simply beautiful!!!
Great balance in this shot. I really like how the bar cuts through.
the funny thing about this is that, because of the stark contrast in color intensity (black as opposed to a subtle grey) the {rail?} almost looks superimposed on the image. with the jagged bits (anti-aliasing) it COULD pass as one of those cutesy little brushes off deviant art that we love so much.
oh, we DO love them.
anyways. whilst not portfolio worthy, i do think you should experiment more with DoF. perhaps not as much as i do {shameless plug} CLICK ME DAMMIT {/shameless plug} and not in a huge spree like with the fisheye lens.. but all the same. people work wonderfully well :)
off topic. ish:
i'm glad you put this up. in some respects - though i know you're into experimenting and whatnot - this is most definately a step up from some of the recent pictures. that said, i can't help but love the novelty of capturing a chav in his element, and yet.. your camera is still in tact! amazing - really.
hugs o-(".)-o
Ooooh I like I like! Definately good depth in this shot.
i like the idea to repeat the circular theme. it gives continuity.
i dont know much about photography and skills.. but this entry is superb! * like all your entries as well =) *
I agree with Adriana, a little dark maybe.
I love the compostion though, wich is a major flaw of mine I feel, not getting the right shot but I will be cheating in future and just cropping until the image is good.
I don't know why but I keep feeling the need for a bigger (deeper) DoF, it does make me feel that the photogrpaher went for the wheel but failed to focus correctly and "missed" it.
Again, the composition is great, the curves very complimentary and great framing.
Beautiful composition.
Yes definitely, the blurred wheel really bugs me and as Robyn P has said, I feel the darkness depressing but not in an atmospheric way. Strange, the shot is great yet misses and those two points and just frustrates. Do it again Dave...
...do it again!
Much better, Dave. Thanks for the tip on BW conversion! I know what you mean with th channel mixer, things can get blotchy when using (too) much of one channel.
It looks not very spontaneous to me, but a lot of elaboration can be seen in this shot. i like the symethry and curves and curves and curves ... :)
Nice title for it. :)
David
Been lurking and admiring your work for a while. I've got myself a 20D, so in theory I can take shots just like yours! In theory.
Just wondering how you learned digital processing - trial and error, a book, a course? If book could you recommend something? I can find my way around Photoshop but when it comes to tarting up images it's all a bit hit and miss (usually miss). I'm trialing Bibble Pro for RAW processing (didn't like Capture One Pro - price / interface).
Thanks.
great shot!
It seems like it needs another element to really make the composition complete. Perhaps something at a distance bewteen the front and rear elements. Other than that, well done.
Thanks everyone.
nogger: I don't think either today's or yesterday's would have worked if I'd inverted the focus.
Beth: I shall tell them you said so ;-)
Alex: ok, more experimentation tomorrow.
Adriana and tobias: I did try a lighter version, but it wasn't very effective.
David: try 'Adobe Photoshop CS for Photographers (by Martin Evening) and/or The Photoshop CS Book for Digital Photographers (by Scott Kelby). I prefer the former, but both are good.
Jamey: I can see what you mean, but I quite like the simplicity of this one.
Very nice shot. This reminds me of Andre Kertesz.
Oh yeah, I love this shot. I remember seeing this a few months ago, and it always stuck with me. Really well seen. I love how the arcs of the foreground thingy are echoed in the ferris wheel.
very 'something wicked this way comes'... i like!