<<< o >>>outpost 17 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

This is the last of the reflection shots I took the other evening and I have to confess that I'm not entirely convinced by this one. My wife likes it – and she's not normally wrong – and I think it would make an interesting print, but I'm not sure that it works all that well at this resolution. For me its worth lies in the fine detail, but the only way to see it at this resolution is to sit there with your nosed pressed up against the screen.

Oh, I don't know. Let me know what you think.

8.21pm on 12/5/05

Canon 20D

100mm f/2.8 Macro USM

f/5.6

1/125

aperture priority

+0.0

evaluative

100

no

RAW

C1 Pro

vertically reversed

captured
camera
lens
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?

 
3x2 + fylde coast [scenic]
comment by Adam C at 08:00 PM (GMT) on 14 May, 2005

There is a little to much distortion for my taste. But the colors are very intriguing (the purple and yellow complement each other well). This "reflections" series was enjoyable.

comment by SteveO at 08:36 PM (GMT) on 14 May, 2005

Hmm, im not too convinced about this one either, i agree there is a little too much distortion so it is barely recognisable as anything really. It also seems a bit noisy compared to your other shots, or is that just a resolution thing?

Not the best reflection shot you have done, yesterdays was my favourite so far.

Just noticed, it looks like the building is actually being blown away by a hurricane or something which is quite cool.

comment by jamie at 09:35 PM (GMT) on 14 May, 2005

well i have to admit that i like it,it kinda reminds me of one of salvador darli's paintings,but i think the reflections are very good,and i just find them pretty original and iteresting...so wot is the reflection of anyway??

comment by djn1 at 09:43 PM (GMT) on 14 May, 2005

Adam and Steve: I think that's what I meant about putting the shot up at this resolution - it lacks detail and anything recognisable. That said, the "being blown away by a hurricane" effect is one I quite like too.

Steve: the version that's up now is less noisy.

jamie: thanks.

comment by peter cohen at 12:09 AM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

One of my all-time favorites of yours.

It's now my desktop background.

:-)

comment by Smallest Photo at 01:18 AM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

My first impression of this was post apocalyptic destruction. Very powerful.

comment by bryanj at 04:00 AM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

It’s purposeful David. nufsaid

comment by miklos at 05:01 AM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

Am I the only one to say that even with your nose pressed against the screen you cannot get 'fine detail' in this photo? And if you have to search THAT much for something worthy to look at.. what's the use of it? Can't make excuses for a misfire sir.. :)

The first one of the series was the only one that deserves credit, in my opinion.

Also, you said "Wy wife" ... Unless the W was meant to be a 180° rotation (just like this photo).. but then you could've said Wh .. or something :)

comment by andrew at 06:18 AM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

three in a row is a bit much.

comment by mikey at 10:15 AM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

im really not liking these last 3 shots. but hey... every other picture is mind blowing so that makes up for it haha

comment by WH at 10:57 AM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

J'aime trop toute cette série de photos "tremblotantes"
qu'il y a en ce moment..

comment by djn1 at 11:16 AM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

OK, a mixed reaction to this one then ;-)

Miklos: thanks for spotting the typo'.

comment by MP at 03:41 PM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

At first it did not seem to be a reflection. To me it seems like a desert picture with mirage effect. I like it.

comment by marie leconte at 05:21 PM (GMT) on 15 May, 2005

"Holy canoly!" was my first reaction...I haven't seen your other reflection shots, and I have no clue what this one reflects, but it would make an amazing poster! I really like its visual effect on me and am quite alright not knowing what it is. It's half the fun of looking at it.

comment by Jason Wall at 04:54 PM (GMT) on 16 May, 2005

I don't like it either. Too blurry, and nothing compelling to the eye.

comment by Shots. at 08:49 AM (GMT) on 31 May, 2005

Great shot.

comment by Meredith at 01:59 AM (GMT) on 1 July, 2005

I absolutely love this. The colors are fabulous and I love the distortion. It looks like an abstract painting. I dont need to see the detail - it the overall effect that makes this so great.