<<< o >>>Fe2O3 #1 41 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

John and I spent a little over an hour today photographing my favourite structure and this is one of three shots that I'm happy with (though don't know which I prefer). I'll put the other two up over the weekend.

Update: the red and white dots – a couple of people wandering in the distance – have gone. They didn't add anything to the shot so I cloned them out.

Update #2: hmmm, seems my chemistry isn't up to much ;-) I've renamed this entry (from FeO2) as per the suggestions in the comments.

11.51am on 12/8/05

Canon 20D

EF 17-40 f/4L USM

17mm (27mm equiv.)

f/8.0

1/200

aperture priority

-1/3

evaluative

100

no

RAW

C1 Pro

minor

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?

 
3x2 + piers [St. Annes] + fylde coast [scenic]
comment by tyler at 10:42 PM (GMT) on 12 August, 2005

Awesome! Great range in color...

comment by s.hu at 10:43 PM (GMT) on 12 August, 2005

impressive and witty use of chemistry (in the title) ;)
i like the shot, but i'm a abit distracted by the red and white dot in the middle... that's probably just me though

comment by djn1 at 10:45 PM (GMT) on 12 August, 2005

s.hu: I did wonder about cloning out the figures, but decided against it. As for the title – it was all I could come up with so I'm glad it amused :-)

comment by Kristina at 10:58 PM (GMT) on 12 August, 2005

AMAZING, wonderful dramatic sky and great focus using depth of field. Such a lovely old-timey feeling to it.

comment by Josiah at 11:03 PM (GMT) on 12 August, 2005

This style and subject work so well together I can't imagine ever tiring of it. Beautiful work, again.

comment by tobias at 11:07 PM (GMT) on 12 August, 2005

Great texture and a wonderful colour. The sky is also interesting.

Beats my work, thus far...

comment by John Washington at 11:22 PM (GMT) on 12 August, 2005

Great texture and nice and contrasty love it.

comment by Ioannis at 11:49 PM (GMT) on 12 August, 2005

Good shot Dave. I'd like to go picture this structure again - when I get a car.

I would perhaps edit this person in the centre of the pic out of the shot. I know this is perhaps "too much editing" but one thing I particularly love about the shot is the blury coastline as in contrast with the pier, both of which are peaceful.

comment by Leo Chen at 12:23 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

The color is great here, tho I would agree with S.hu about the white dot in the center. It just seems a wee bit out of place. No biggie tho. Beautifully done.

comment by nogger at 12:27 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Or is it Fe2O3? :-)

comment by hiba at 12:33 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

OH wowwwwww!

the texture, the colours, the background! beautiful !

comment by seanchem at 12:33 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

I'm a big fan of macro photos anyway...and this makes me an even bigger fan. And I'm going to agree with nogger on the Fe2O3.

Keep shooting those great photos.

comment by seanchem at 12:37 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Sorry to post two in a row, but I guess I should have said that I'm a big fan of 'close-up' photography - I'm new at all of this, so I don't know if this is considered a macro-type shot. Please correct me if I'm wrong. :)

comment by KeirAyres at 12:52 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Dave this is a great contrast to your last range of pictures and I love it, the texture and sharpness is superb and the colours and contrast are beautiful. Great job even for you =P

comment by owen-b at 01:08 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

I viewed the photo after the people were cloned out (I wonder who they were and how they'd feel about being 'cloned out'!) and it's one of my favourite shots of yours. I love the apparent vignetteing, the richness and saturation of colours, the deepness of the shadows, the level of blur in the distance, and the sharpness of the detail in the foreground. I aspire to create shots so filmic and rich as this.

David, do you ever selectively add post-process lens blur into your images, artistically?

comment by Kaarel Kala at 01:21 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

wicked shot. love it

comment by Smallest Photo at 01:27 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

love the focus on this one.

comment by Magnus von Koeller at 02:01 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Hmmmm. Well, I hate to disagree. But honestly, I find this shot to be fairly boring. It's not bad or anything, it just doesn't get me excited at all -- at least compared to all your other awesome shots.

comment by Ioannis at 02:06 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Ah! The people vanished! Good work, I could never get it so right!

comment by Judith Polakoff at 02:07 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

The color combination is very striking in this one, and I especially like the quality of light on the rope.

comment by Dave at 02:10 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

This is s striking and superb composition. Excellent work.

comment by Brian at 02:51 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Beautiful - love the rest and the little town in the distance

comment by m at 03:59 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

I'm intrigued, I'd like to see the one with the people in and the difference between the two. Do you have a link?

comment by Fred at 04:36 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

I like it alot. I do think there's some evidence though of selective blurring to accentuate the depth of field effect. For example, the strand of rope that has the beach as its background is out of focus, but the wood in the bottom right, just beyond the iron structure, is in focus, yet it must be further away than the strand of rope. I presume, Dave, you blurred the strand of rope along with the rest of the background?

That said, I think it is a fabulous shot.

comment by Ed at 06:12 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Nice detail. At first glance I thought the ropes were some kind of creature!

comment by lisa at 08:04 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Very nice shot, I'm not sure what it is about it but I really like it. I think it's the off-center/point of focus that I like.

comment by Arthur at 10:42 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Love it. I really enjoy taking this type of shot myself, though this has much more contrast than I usually dare to put in mine! Yet more inspiration from Chromasia! :)

I like the almost vignetted effect the darkening of the sky gives to the top cormers, too. Look forward to the others.

Any sign of the new arrival?!

comment by owen at 11:02 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

I love it. Great details and colours.

comment by djn1 at 11:05 AM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

owen-b and m: the figures weren't recognisable as such - just a small white blob and an even smaller red one.

owen-b and Fred: the focus/blur is as-shot. As for the strand of rope over the beach: it is farther away than the wood in the bottom-right corner.

comment by m at 01:21 PM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

To add to the ever present debate on "processing" Can cloning out part of the image be really be compared to dark room processing?

comment by Nick at 02:35 PM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

I don't think you have struck a pleasing balance between background and subject here - too much of the former. The main feature should be the texture of the rust and wood. Perhaps it would have been more effective if you angled the camera downwards and blurred the background more.

comment by Joe Lencioni at 03:11 PM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

This is a very nice shot. It has a great variety of textures and nice colors. Vignetting = good. Colors = good. RE: cloning being compared to dark room processing, I would personally say that some of it is probably possible with dark room processing, but it would be very very difficult. But I'm no dark room wiz either. I just couldn't imagine how hard it would be to get it just right... that is, unless there is some sort of special equipment out there to help that process.

comment by SJ at 05:55 PM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Oh that's beautiful. The colours are just classy.

comment by mehdi at 05:57 PM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Supreb.

comment by erik at 07:03 PM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

i was trying to say, great image becaust it looks unreal. the background looks like it's a painting.

i hope i can get through this time - before i got an error page after clicking POST , with no possibility to go back to where i was.

erik
photoblog http://eti-eti.blogspot.com

comment by djn1 at 07:15 PM (GMT) on 13 August, 2005

Thanks everyone.

comment by Bug Girl at 02:33 AM (GMT) on 14 August, 2005

I like the dramatic lighting. And the out of focus background. Beautiful.

comment by Eric at 01:42 AM (GMT) on 15 August, 2005

I really like the colors and bokeh in the photo. Maybe it is just me but I wish the metal and wood took up a bit more of the frame. Either that or just a tad lower angle of where the camera set.

comment by vivien at 03:11 AM (GMT) on 15 August, 2005

this one is awesome, i love the colors.

comment by Matthew at 06:49 PM (GMT) on 24 August, 2005

This picture is 10 points! it makes a phanominal wall paper

comment by skin care cream at 03:44 AM (GMT) on 11 October, 2005

wrinkle cream
botox alternative
antiaging skin care
anti wrinkle cream
skin care cream
anti-aging moisturizer
antiaging skin care treatment
botox alternatives
antiaging skin care product
anti wrinkle
anti wrinkle creams
anti-wrinkle cream
wrinkle reducer
antiaging skin care cream lotion