<<< o >>>facing the world 28 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

I took a shot a couple of minutes before this one, where the light was better, but the composition didn't work out. So I shot a few more, of which this was the best. I would have preferred it to have been more striking, but I'm pleased with the composition and the overall feel of the shot.

On another matter: AT and John both commented on yesterday's shot to the effect that it was pixelated. On my screen there's no pixelation at all. Does anyone know what might cause John's and AT's setup to show a pixelated version of the shot? I can't figure it out.

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
11.10am on 16/9/05
Canon 20D
EF 17-40 f/4L USM
38mm (61mm equiv.)
f/4.0
1/1000
aperture priority
-1/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
no
 
3x2
comment by Mark at 10:55 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2005

Beautiful color. DOF is great. I like the composition.

comment by george i at 10:58 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2005

I like the dreamlike quality. Didn't catch it at first, but is that a face in the design?

comment by David Kapp at 11:22 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2005

Make sure their monitors are set to display the highest number of colors. I've had people email me with the same complaint and found out they were running their monitor on 256 colors or something crazy like that.

I'm guessing this is a reflection shot, or is it shooting through the window? Either way, I like the DOF. Any more or less building in focus could be distracting and take away from the image.

comment by f. d. rahman at 11:46 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2005

really interesting photo.. I like the look of the buildings in the back.. nice capture.

comment by Viking054 at 11:48 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2005

I didn't like this at first, in full size, but now looking at the thumbnail it's pretty cool. I like the background. I was too distracted by the shapes in front to notice how nicely the background complements it. Anyway, in the end, I like it :)

And I thought those other guys were crazy, imagining the pixelation-- but I played around with my monitor for a while and I can see it now too. When I turn up the gamma on my display it stands out. It happens anywhere that dark colors fade into each other. So I'd recommend those guys lower the gamma if they can.

comment by Svante at 11:57 PM (GMT) on 16 September, 2005

I use millions of colors on my Powerbook G4 17". I did not notice until I looked for it, but from certain angles on my LCD screen (especially a little bit from above) I notice that right above the lighter purple area on the right side of yesterdays shot there's one major dark pixelated area. If you look on an LCD screen you will shurely see it. As with today's posting I like the shot and the post processiong.

comment by jeremy parker at 12:03 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

There are a lot of your photos where I can see pixilation on my powerbook even though I'm using millions of colors as well. I always attributed it to the lcd screen because it's not a problem on my crt at work.

comment by Rock at 12:06 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

The etching/painting on the window reminds me of wifts of smoke. Quite an interesting effect with the blurred background buildings.

comment by :::ARMOKS::: at 12:10 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

Very interesting picture
I like the composition, but somehow my eyes keep hovering over the picture without an answer...or is it just me...

comment by Jem at 12:25 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

I love the "abstractness" of this shot Dave. The colours, shapes and shades all work together in perfect unison. Great work :)

comment by nogger at 12:36 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

I'm using an LCD (an NEC 1770NX calibrated with a Spyder 2) and I can't see it. There again, maybe I just don't know what I'm looking for or just used to it by now.

comment by Andrew at 01:37 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

I like it. What is in the foreground?

comment by Rodrigo Gómez at 01:46 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

I have seen another shot here, the one of the fireworks, that clearly showed the effects of the JPG compression, but only seeing it under certain angles of the screen. I'm using an LCD (Dell 24") screen on a Mac, and calibrate it about once every 3 weeks or so. In the shot yesterday I think there is also some visible JPG artifacts in the black areas, but not as clearly visible as the other one, and much more difficult to see it... what compression setting you usually use for your photos?

comment by Kevin at 02:28 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

I'm trying to use your gaussian blur overlay technique in photoshop on some of my images and it always oversaturates and throws off the colors so the picture doesn't look real at all...you can definately tell its been altered.

When you do it the colors all look like they remained the same, looks very clean, etc.

It's like...a persons skin will be normal, i'll do a 4 or 5.0 gaussian blur overlay and their skin gets neon pink (not that bad, hopefully you know what I mean)...how do I fix this???? please help.

comment by Rick at 03:21 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

Never noticed it before, but can see 'something' in the black regions on the sides if I crank the green gamma all the way up. I personally wouldn't call it pixelation, probably more like the jpeg compression the Rodrigo spoke of...

comment by Sharla at 05:15 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

Classic c h r o m a s i a !

Wonderful composition. I like the painted/etched glass and how you were successful "aligning" the foreground over the background. The suggestion of an eye and nose and mouth may be more real than just mere suggestion.

I see a hint of the inside of a beauty shop/products or coffee shop.

comment by hd connelly at 05:32 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

the forms remind me of wisps of smoke...very interesting shot!

comment by joan at 07:35 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

Wow! Beautiful and magical.

comment by Ricardo at 08:56 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

I am a very original photo, very pretty, like. Greetings

comment by GP at 10:15 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

Dream, ghost or what else?! Very good job. Great composition and idea.

comment by John Washington at 10:24 AM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

This is good Dave - I love it.

Re the pixelation - I think it is mainly an LCD problem, On my CRT Monitor it is not noticeabal

great picture.

comment by Mapi at 02:13 PM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

Moltomolto bella! Complimenti mapi

comment by lisa at 08:19 PM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

ouu. a very neat shot. I like it a lot.

comment by djn1 at 09:00 PM (GMT) on 17 September, 2005

Thanks everyone.

As for the pixilation: I guess I'm not sure why some people are seeing it and others aren't.

Kevin: the technique works best of moderately saturated images. If the colours do get too much though try partially desaturing it.

comment by Kevin at 04:32 AM (GMT) on 18 September, 2005

^^

Thanks!

comment by Li-May at 06:44 AM (GMT) on 21 September, 2005

i like the evil eyes...
must b the thicker lines on it..

cant help but wonder how this shot would turn out if it was evening,
and the 'face' had a slight diffusion/glow to it...

comment by zoomvienna at 09:59 PM (GMT) on 26 September, 2005

strong idea...I would have liked to see it with the horizon line straight in the back...i.e. the house. Nice diversity lately Dave.

-T

comment by 3 at 05:07 PM (GMT) on 23 November, 2005

Hi there

I have been given the task of getting links for our websites that have good page rank on the links directories.
In addition we have many categories so your site will be place on an appropriate page.
If you would like to trade links please send me your website linking details.
Our apologies if you do not wish to take part in a link exchange.

Best Regards,

Mariana Snider

mariana_snider@o2.pl