<<< o >>>heaven's wings 39 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

For the first time in weeks I felt quite inspired when I went out today. I didn't come back with hundreds of great shots, but I do have a few that are ok, and I did enjoy it. Oh, and this is a sculpture, of sorts, on Blackpool's South Shore.

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
1.25pm on 19/9/05
Canon 20D
EF 17-40 f/4L USM
17mm (27mm equiv.)
f/7.1
1/320
aperture priority
-1/3
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
no
 
3x2 + fylde coast [scenic]
comment by GP at 09:04 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

WOW! Amazing! And this is the FIRST comment! ;-)

comment by Kristina at 09:13 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

I really like this David because it makes you look harder. The diagonal lines are as if to say "nothing to see here, look away" but looking further, it's like the reward. Poetic photo! I haven't seen a poetic photograph of yours in a while (probably because you are so busy being dad to a newborn!). glad to see it's still there!!

comment by Mike at 09:20 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

Kind of hurts my eyes, David, but that may be because my monitor is lame and the lines are flickering. Neat shot.

comment by StuartR at 09:34 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

It really does require you to look harder... Very bold lines, certainly not a conventional composition! Very creative, nice one!

comment by B-art at 09:51 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

Hmm somehow the thumb is sharper than the actual phot. I mean, only after I saw the thumb, I realised what was in the actual photo. But then again, my eyes are not what they used to be.. ;-)

comment by dp at 09:51 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

While most photoblogs I visit show pictures I can "understand", some of yours leave me wondering what on earth I'm looking at. Even with your description indiciating a sculpture, my interpretation of this photograph is through an ample dose of imagination (most of which would be wrong so I shall not hazard any guesses). You're the Composition King! :-)

comment by djn1 at 10:01 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

Just to clarify ...

This is a metal structure, made up of bars of varying thickness. Where there are thin bars/struts you can see more of the background; i.e. what's behind the structure, and where the struts/bars are thicker you can see less. In other words, the image embedded in the structure is a function of the thickness of the vertical struts.

comment by Adriana at 10:06 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

What an original composition. You really need to look at it harder so you can figure it out what it is. Funny how the imagination can make you build something totally different. At first, I thought it was a picture taken under a grid where one of your girls was jumping. Nothing to do with what it really is. I love the sepia tone. :)

comment by Leo at 10:28 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

I had no idea what this was until I saw the thumbnail in the comments. It's kind of a magic eyeish thing I guess.

The colors of the sky are nice, I like the sepia tone of this shot. Makes it feel more old-school

comment by *~*flying cow*~* at 10:33 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

i love the angle. the tones are perfectly moody. the sculpture is fabulous.
love the composition!

comment by Adriana at 10:54 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

What an original composition. You really need to look at it harder so you can figure it out what it is. Funny how the imagination can make you build something totally different. At first, I thought it was a picture taken under a grid where one of your girls was jumping. Nothing to do with what it really is. I love the sepia tone. :)

comment by Rock at 11:18 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

Quite an interesting image. The tobacco colored sky is very nice. The perspective you chose adds a lot of tension.

Let's not forget to praise the unnamed artist who created the piece! He or she is worthy of a great deal of praise.

comment by miklos at 11:37 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

At first glance i was like.. wtf. what the hell is this?
I have to admit. That's pretty neat. I would imagine this is one of thise things that you have to be right beside in order to appreciate it fully..

comment by Christopher at 11:49 PM (GMT) on 19 September, 2005

Whoa! this one is totally unique and uncharacteristic of the typical chromasia shot. It is hard to look at for too long because of the flickering however did you work on this?

comment by Ed { tfk } at 01:17 AM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Interesting abstract, when I first looked at it I didn't see the legs... maybe I'm tired.

comment by ling at 02:37 AM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

I agree with adriana. At first I thought it was one of your kids jumping. But looking harder I realise I can't see her head from the side. Haha....Nice picture. I find it very very abstract!

comment by pfong at 02:41 AM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

great composition and toning. Did you deliberately mask out the sepia tone from selected portions of the picture? Nicely done.

comment by Sharla at 02:47 AM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Another c l a s s i c. 'Nuff said. I love it!

Your explanation of the sculpture was absolutely necessary. I'm also impressed with said sculpture. The concept is straight forward enough, like a specialized screen in printing, but I do wonder how the sculptor actually shaped each bar?

comment by Madison at 02:53 AM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Woah, this shot took me forever to figure out. But i love it!!

comment by ::: A R M O K S ::: at 03:49 AM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Very original shot David...Love the composition

comment by lisa at 05:24 AM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

I absolutely love how strange and almost obscure this is. You sort of have to look at it longer to figure it out.

comment by SteveO at 09:36 AM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Thats a cool sculpture, i love stuff like that. Very well presented.

comment by 3XFrame at 11:41 AM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

PP (Perfect Photo)

comment by Crash at 12:34 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

wow! its scarey ho you find these objects! still not sure what I m looking at, but I love that gray/sepia sky

comment by jean philippe at 01:42 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

great shot !!!

how do you make this sky so "intense"? all my skies are flat and lifeless :(

comment by Ioannis at 02:07 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Inspiration did work amazingly well. I had tried to take a picture of this one but had not thought of your composition and obviously if you take a straight shot it is boring.

By the way, your server is a bit slow... I thought you were gonna move?

comment by Lex at 03:15 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

I very much like the tone and colourising, however whenever another's art is the central feature they must surely take the greater credit, unless of course the sculpture is only brought to life by this picture! Wonderful site btw, good to see someone who creates images from everyday places/people/things. Too many languid photographers rely on the subject itself to make a picture worth looking at, be it a famous person/mountain/building - which surely is missing the point. A picture shouldn't simply remind you of something you have already seen, and in this sense this photograph is a worthy addition to your collection.

comment by djn1 at 03:16 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

pfong: no, the toning was applied across the image, it's just that the lighter areas are quite close to being white.

jean phillippe: the trick with skies, such as it is, is to make sure that you don't overexpose them, then increase the contrast with the Curves tool.

Ioannis: all being well chromasia will be moved some time over the next couple of weeks.

comment by Kevin at 04:19 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

DJN1...how do you remember the settings for every photograph? Do you write down the settings everytime you take a picture?

comment by John Duncan at 05:20 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

It's all available from the camera isn't it? Certainly in RAW.

I'm more interested in how you remember what you've done with photoshop - is it available in the psd file? I've never dug deep enough.....

comment by Dutch PhotoDay at 06:44 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Great shot, I love the angle!

comment by Christopher at 06:52 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Kevin,

Any digital photo that is taken stores the EXIF data in the file. In Photoshop if you go to: file>get info you will see it.

comment by thais at 06:54 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Adorei!!! É uma foto curiosa... q nos faz querer olhar mais...pensar e apreciar!!! Parabêns!!!

comment by John Washington at 07:28 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Nicely done Dave - Good diagnol composition makes tis shot very effective.

comment by Jolyon Jonas at 08:48 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

I don't like this one very much. I liked your brighter ones more. However, this is still a very deep and breathtaking photo.

comment by djn1 at 09:19 PM (GMT) on 20 September, 2005

Thanks everyone.

comment by Kevin at 03:21 AM (GMT) on 21 September, 2005

What if you have a 35mm camera, how do you remember the settings?

comment by Francesco at 06:37 PM (GMT) on 22 September, 2005

great photo, the colouring is simply beautiful

comment by 3 at 05:07 PM (GMT) on 23 November, 2005

Hi there

I have been given the task of getting links for our websites that have good page rank on the links directories.
In addition we have many categories so your site will be place on an appropriate page.
If you would like to trade links please send me your website linking details.
Our apologies if you do not wish to take part in a link exchange.

Best Regards,

Mariana Snider

mariana_snider@o2.pl